Three annotated letter manuscripts
Scholarly practices of religious Franks in the margin unveiled
in Religious Franks
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter analyses some of the annotating practices, in order to highlight the diversity and also the shared customs of reading and writing in the period, both in religious and in secular texts. It showcases three letter manuscripts that share certain features but are different in other aspects. The first manuscript is a collection of the Moral Letters from Seneca to his pupil Lucilius, Paris, BnF, lat. 8658A. The second manuscript is a collection of letters of St Paul, edited and put together by Florus of Lyon, Bern, Burgerbibliothek, Cod. 344. The third one, Paris, BnF, lat. 2858, is the unique copy of the letters of Lupus of Ferrieres. From these examples, the chapter moves to observations on marginal practices in other manuscripts, to explore the personal annotation practices of ninth-century scholars.

Religious Franks

Religion and power in the Frankish Kingdoms: studies in honour of Mayke de Jong


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 47 7 0
Full Text Views 27 1 0
PDF Downloads 30 5 0