The Carolingians and the Regula Benedicti
in Religious Franks
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter addresses the question of how monks and monastic reformers dealt with the disconnect between the content of the Regula Benedicti and their own reality. Normative observance has its history and its genesis, and it is certainly not productive to reduce it to any modern legalistic understanding. The chapter suggests a typology of four basic models of textual techniques to bridge the gap between regula and reality: exegesis, selective reading, 'objectivation' and embodiment. None of these practices can be correctly described as a 'symbolic' reading of the Regula Benedicti (as Pius Engelbert phrased it) or using the Regula Benedicti simply as a metaphor (as Josef Semmler suggested it). All of them demonstrate an intensive engagement with its content but also a variety of attempts to get around its normative character.

Religious Franks

Religion and power in the Frankish Kingdoms: studies in honour of Mayke de Jong


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 22 1
Full Text Views 37 5 0
PDF Downloads 25 6 0