From Justinian to Louis the Pious
Inalienability of church property and the sovereignty of a ruler in the ninth century
in Religious Franks
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter shows how elites in the time of Louis the Pious discussed landed property belonging to churches, and how old Roman law was used in the process to secure that property's status. In this debate, the recourse to sixth-century Roman law enabled certain actors to assign the ruler a distinctive position standing over the community of the ecclesia. The idea that ecclesiastical property should be treated as inalienable would have an enormous impact on both legal theory and practice. For it shaped the types of transaction that could be used when dealing with church property in a characteristic manner, so that donation, precaria oblata, infeudation and exchange dominate our ecclesiastical charter evidence from the early Middle Ages onwards. As is well known, it was from the twelfth century onwards that the idea of church property as inalienable would form the starting point for a new conception of sovereignty.

Religious Franks

Religion and power in the Frankish Kingdoms: studies in honour of Mayke de Jong


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 83 29 1
Full Text Views 36 0 0
PDF Downloads 27 3 0