Jenny Andersson
Search for other papers by Jenny Andersson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Concluding remarks
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter presents some concluding thoughts from the author. It suggests that a central point of change in Swedish social democratic thought is the gradual acceptance in party ideology of a group in Swedish society that is not productive and that constantly falls behind. The empirical observation of the existence of such a group, as happened in the 1960s, and the rhetorical construction of it in a political discourse drawing on descriptions such as ‘weak’, ‘handicapped’, and ‘those who can't cope’, are of course two interrelated things. The emergence of this group—and the gradual acceptance of its existence in social democratic discourse—is a major challenge to the logic of productive universalism. A group that cannot be presumed to participate on the same terms as others is a burden on the solidarity of others, and the question then is how to create space within notions of solidarity for such differences.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Between growth and security

Swedish social democracy from a strong society to a third way

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 227 178 4
Full Text Views 69 16 0
PDF Downloads 33 8 0