Nordic government(s)
Parliamentary, presidential or prime ministerial?
in Scandinavian politics today
Abstract only
Get Access to Full Text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Access Tokens

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter focuses on the executive-parties dimension and in particular on two striking differences in the nature of the political executive across the Nordic region. First, there is the contrast, in Arend Lijphart's terms, between the executive-legislative balance systems of the 'metropolitan' Scandinavian states of Denmark, Norway and Sweden and the executive dominant systems of Finland and Iceland. Second, there is the contrast, in Maurice Duverger's terms, between the semi-presidential systems of Finland and Iceland and the parliamentary governments in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. The chapter examines whether a fundamental convergence across the region has witnessed the emergence of prime minister-dominant parliamentary executives. In contrast to Richard Rose, the leadership role of the prime minister and the increased importance and power of the office have been emphasised in the Scandinavian literature.




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 92 62 0
Full Text Views 12 6 0
PDF Downloads 10 5 0