Kimberly Hutchings
Search for other papers by Kimberly Hutchings in
Current site
Google Scholar
Apocalyptic times
in Time and world politics
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter examines Virilio's and Agamben's accounts of world politics. Virilio and Agamben, like Arendt and Benjamin, reject historicism and social science, taking them to be two, equally regrettable, sides of the coin of modern hubris. In Virilio's case, the re-thinking of chromos as globalised, infinitely accelerating time provides the key to the interpretation of contemporary world politics, which is a story of decline and potential apocalypse. For Agamben, the present is also identified with a potentially terrible end of history, as the ‘state of exception’ becomes the normal condition for the conduct of global politics. For both thinkers, redressing this parlous situation requires the re-assertion of political time, which Virilio understands in Arendtian terms as the spatial control of chromos, and Agamben in terms of Benjamin's messianic time.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Top

Time and world politics

Thinking the present


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 85 9 2
Full Text Views 16 0 0
PDF Downloads 14 0 0