Between promise and practice
in Groups, representation and democracy
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

This chapter asks whether there is cause for pessimism or optimism regarding groups as democratic agents. It rehearses the main findings from the book and suggests areas where further work may be carried out. It also ponders how we might explain and then deal with the finding that most groups do not wholly fulfil representative potential. It argues that the paradox of representation — claiming to speak for what is absent — means that all groups confront a ‘gap’ in terms of demonstrating democratic accountability and authorization. The key question is how this gap is assessed. The discussion argues that modes of representation are institutions, and, as such, the appropriateness of a form of representation will change over time and be contested.

Groups, representation and democracy

Between promise and practice

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 8 1
Full Text Views 20 2 0
PDF Downloads 14 4 0