Silver screen sedition
Auteurship and exploitation in the history of punk cinema
in Fight back
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.

ACCESS TOKENS

If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

Like its expression in music, fashion and design, punk's presence in cinema has been eclectic. Undoubtedly, a marked dimension of avant-garde auteurship has always featured in punk's relation with film. Punk cinema's association with the camp and the carnivalesque was continued in John Waters' Polyester. Several independent filmmakers developed a sustained relationship with punk as both, a theme and a source of creative inspiration. The early 1980s boom in independent filmmaking also brought several punk-oriented films centred on young women. As Nicholas Rombes observes, 'new punk cinema' was less a coherent, unified school of film than a loose set of filmmaking styles and production strategies informed by the sensibilities of punk. The democratic spur and antipathy to Hollywood orthodoxy has a distinct affinity with Stacy Thompson's 'punk cinema' ideals.

Fight back

Punk, politics and resistance

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 82 36 4
Full Text Views 38 2 0
PDF Downloads 30 0 0