Opposition and support, 1850–98
in The Protestant Orphan Society and its social significance in Ireland, 1828–1940
Abstract only
Log-in for full text

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

manchesterhive requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals - to see content that you/your institution should have access to, please log in through your library system or with your personal username and password.

If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/extracts and download selected front and end matter. 

Institutions can purchase access to individual titles; please contact manchesterhive@manchester.ac.uk for pricing options.


If you have an access token for this content, you can redeem this via the link below:

Redeem token

This chapter examines the two directly opposing views of Protestant Orphan Societies (POS) which emerged in the second half of the nineteenth century. At one end of the spectrum of opinion were Archbishop Cullen and Margaret Aylward who investigated the charity on the grounds of suspected proselytism. At the other end of the spectrum were social reformers who regarded the POS boarding-out scheme as an ideal child welfare model worthy of imitation. Cullen called for unity among Catholic bishops against Irish Church Missions (ICM) missionary progress in the west of Ireland. The Charitable Protestant Orphan Union (CPOU) had a clear purpose, 'to preserve the Protestantism of the orphans of mixed marriages'. POS, which continued to support 'the family system' as opposed to the placement of orphans in workhouses, met a specific demand for relief from the lower middle class who invested in their children's futures by subscribing to the charity.



All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 14 0
Full Text Views 31 9 0
PDF Downloads 22 7 0