Alex Gekker
Search for other papers by Alex Gekker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sam Hind
Search for other papers by Sam Hind in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sybille Lammes
Search for other papers by Sybille Lammes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chris Perkins
Search for other papers by Chris Perkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Clancy Wilmott
Search for other papers by Clancy Wilmott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Conclusion
Back to the future

This concluding chapter stresses the implications of arguments made by authors in the different sections of the book; highlighting possible broader research questions surrounding digital mapping and temporality that arise. In particular, in relation to the first section of the book, it suggests research might usefully attend to relations of spatiality and temporality, focus on the difficulties of distinguishing between the ephemeral and epochal, and investigate temporal consequences stemming from layering implicit in digital mapping. From the second section, it suggests research might attend more to the possibilities of resistance in the face of technological inevitability, that research might focus on methods for understanding affordances arising in the stitching together of everyday memories in a transient technological age, and suggests we might focus more on places than on spaces in that context. From the final section, it suggests that conceptual, material and anticipatory logics underpinning the organisation of time in digital mapping demand attention. Together, these directions highlight the profoundly social consequences of a shift towards temporality.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.

 

Time for mapping

Cartographic temporalities

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 825 192 9
PDF Downloads 386 55 2