Peter Burnell
Search for other papers by Peter Burnell in
Current site
Google Scholar

Democratisation studies greatly profits from expanding its disciplinary and geographical constraints. This chapter amplifies such sentiments, presenting reasons as to why the students of politics should reject parochialism in their attempts to understand democratization. The fruitfulness of applying several disciplines to the analysis of politics varies across different kinds of political phenomena. Like the study of politics, the other disciplines too are dynamic, and their approaches can even vary according to distinct national, cultural and educational or professional institutional traditions. There are differences of time, place and circumstance that impact on the way political phenomena, including democracy, is viewed. Political scientists studying democratization appear much taken with the idea of judicial autonomy as a part of the institutional architecture for ensuring the horizontal accountability of the executive. This chapter also presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

All of MUP's digital content including Open Access books and journals is now available on manchesterhive.




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 288 51 6
PDF Downloads 232 17 1