Search results
expert witnesses were altered, seeking to limit the misuse of expert evidence But by 2009 it was clear that the Woolf reforms had not resulted in total success. Research commissioned by the Ministry of Justice suggested that delay was less of a problem with cases taking less time between issuing a claim and trial or settlement. 66 But costs had risen 67 and thus as we have seen Lord Justice Jackson was asked to conduct a further review of civil litigation costs, resulting in radical change to the funding of claims. The Clinical Negligence
Union Congress, Lord Chief Justice, or head of a charity. They are complemented by others who are appointed because of their individual achievements, such as leading figures in sport (such as Paralympian Tanni Grey-Thompson) or campaigners such as Doreen Lawrence, mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence, and John Bird, founder of The Big Issue magazine. Some are appointed because they are the leading experts in their field – that is, they are highly trained and have reached the top of their profession. The House includes leading lawyers, doctors, scientists
claims incited by greedy lawyers are damaging public services including the NHS. The principles of law may not be affected by such rhetoric but as we shall see in the next chapter, the process of bringing a claim has become more difficult. The standard of care demanded of the doctor is the standard of the reasonably skilled and experienced doctor. In Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee , 29 McNair J said: The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill. A man need not possess the highest expert
effective means of implementing policy as a way to take their parties beyond old politics, such as state control for the left and too much adherence to markets for the right. This agenda attracts leaders of political parties of different stripes to the project of modernization in its many forms. By 2019 the climate of consensus and support for technocratic policy-making no longer appears to be so secure, when newly elected politicians seem less likely to automatically back the mainstream point of view. Expert views appear to be more contested and seen by some as
strategic tasks facing our country’. As a result, important objectives were effectively ‘ignored’. 19 This is in part, as Stephen Fortescue has argued, because of the problem of ‘vedomstvennost’ – ministries and agencies have strong vertical hierarchies, usually based on a particular sector, which claim the loyalty of all officials in that sector. Officials are usually technical experts in the ministry’s area of responsibility, often working their way up through the ranks to ministerial level, Fortescue argues, and, as a result, they see the world in the technical terms
, 2013 ). These types of projects are applicable across a range of disciplines, including social sciences and the humanities. The chapter considers the ways in which non-experts and researchers might collaborate, including approaches like the Science Shops movement, as well as projects driven by individuals’ interests, like hackspaces and the maker movement. Some of these might not, at first look, appear fruitful areas for research communication, but there are opportunities to tap into the existing interests and needs of people that also provide avenues for
shifts over time in both public and expert opinion. For example, at one time smoking was even recommended by some doctors, for example as a means of calming ‘nerves’. Non-smokers were often seen as odd or unsociable. Certainly, advocacy of non-smoking was a fringe activity. As more evidence became available regarding the harm caused by smoking, medical opinion shifted. Tobacco companies sought to defend smoking on libertarian grounds, but this became more difficult when evidence mounted about the harm caused by passive smoking, leading to more stringent restrictions
. The notion that ‘means–end rationality’ becomes problematic when it is disconnected from the overriding concern with ‘substantive rationality’, i.e. the concern with a reasonable society that serves human emancipation, is central to Critical Theory (although it can similarly be found in Max Weber). Such irrational rationality manifests itself in the form of modern bureaucracy and in particular the figure of ‘the expert’, who is now, under the rule of an autonomized bureaucracy, a specialist in issues of process as such , unlike the formerly dominant specialists in
are few convincing LRM voices in the public debate (as opposed to ministers in Philippe's government). Very few LRM deputies had prior national-level party political experience; only twenty-seven (of 309) were previously deputies, nearly all of them from the PS. LRM deputies openly envisaged their roles as becoming technical experts in particular domains, as part of a broader managerial culture. As a result of its origins as a political start-up, LRM has been marked by the search for new ideas and policies rather than structures, and a relative disinterest in
After the referendum in Schleswig-Holstein in 1920, Sarah Wambaugh, an American expert on referendums, concluded: Democracy cannot be served by faulty plebiscites [we would call them referendums]. If we are to keep the tool, we must learn how to use it