Search results
: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 217–18. 22 Orend, ‘Kant’s Ethics of War and Peace’, 167–9. 23 Mertens, ‘War and International Order in Kant’s Legal Thought’, 311; T. Mertens, ‘Kant’s Cosmopolitan Values and Supreme Emergencies’, Journal of Social Philosophy , 38:2 (2007
first to draw attention to the contributions of the monarchomachs (those who fight monarchs, as coined by the contemporary Scottish jurist William Barclay) as well as of Bodin to the theory of intervention is probably the French legal historian Adhémar Esmein, in 1900. 43 The contribution of the author of Vindicae was also alluded to by William Archibald Dunning in his History of Political Thought from Luther to Montesquieu (1905), 44 and in the
Political Thought: T. H. Green, Herbert Spencer, and Henry Sidgwick’, Modern Intellectual History , 3:2 (2006), 236–7; M. Wight, ‘Mazzini’, in G. Wight and B. Porter (eds), Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant and Mazzini (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 109. 25 Pitts, A Turn to Empire , 1–100; Pagden, The Enlightenment and Why It Still Matters , 329
. 7 Quoted in G. Carnazza Amari, ‘Nouvel exposé du principe de non-intervention’, Revue du droit international et de législation comparée , 5 (1873), 363. 8 J. Jennings, ‘Nationalist Ideas in the Early Years of the July Monarchy: Armand Carrel and Le National’, History of Political Thought , 7:3 (1991), 497–8, 507–8. 9 Vincent
Duncan Bell (ed.), Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 48; C. Sylvest, British Liberal Internationalism, 1830–1930: Making Progress? (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009), 63–6, 69. 3 Sylvest, British Liberal Internationalism , 48. 4
. Mai, J. Moll, and A. Vion, 2014. ‘The AntiAtlas of Borders: A Manifesto’, Journal of Borderlands Studies 29(4): 503–12. Parker, N. and N. Vaughan-Williams, 2009. ‘Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies’, Geopolitics 14(3): 582–7. Rose, N., 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought , Cambridge: Cambridge
While this notion was not entirely new – Hobson’s and Lenin’s views on imperialism, for instance, were already known – its penetration into everyday political thought in virtually all parts of the world was new. 16 While the 1960s would produce more significant studies on what we call the North–South divide, notable