strategies adopted and the institutional background at work. Indeed, Chapter 4 will suggest that ‘old’ social democracy is far from dead, precisely because there is far more heterogeneity
than accounts of the investment state, or the competition state, or the
workfare state, or whatever, normally allow for. Even so, I neither want
to underestimate the degree of state convergence that globalisation
implies and the ‘security state’ is a working hypothesis that I apply to the
UK and USA, two countries in which the NSD has arguably been most
influential. Second, however, this
there has always been
some expectation that benefit claimants will work, hence the principle of social insurance. The distinction has become popular to disguise the fact that what is now called active welfare is little more than
a synonym for workfare policies that often coerce and punish the
victim. Economic efficacy is now supposedly gained by reforming the
worker rather than reforming the market.
The idea that the Old Left ignored the importance of duties is another
caricature (Deacon, 2000: 15). In fact, the NSD merely updates the
principle of ‘less eligibility
substantial continuities between the nineteenth-century
minimalist state and the post-Victorian ‘penal–welfare’ state. He underlines the extent to which eugenics inspired the modern system of social
security, so that the latter is the institutional embodiment of the genetic
endowments we are assumed to possess. According to this interpretation,
social policy prods the genetically unfit into labour colonies, workfare and
social assistance schemes (King, 1999) and designs labour exchanges and
social insurance systems for the genetically fit.
Taken individually, none of the
forms of uneven development’, European
Urban and Regional Studies, 10:1, 49–67.
Jessop, B. (2004), Towards a Schumpetarian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist
Political Economy (Lancaster: University of Lancaster, originally 1993).
Jessop, B. (2013), ‘Revisiting the regulation approach: Critical reflections on the contradictions, dilemmas, fixes and crisis dynamics of growth regimes’, Capital and Class,
Kristensen, P. H., and Rocha, R. S. (2012), ‘New roles for the trade unions five lines of
action for carving out a new governance regime