Search results

Economic background and political rationales
Akmal Bazarbaev and Cloé Drieu

This chapter discusses the causes, character and rationale of the revolt, by shedding a new light on the specific case of the district (uezd) of Jizzakh, the site of the worst violence and repression in the sedentary areas of Turkestan. As this chapter demonstrates, imperial land policies and the development of cereal production, rather than the process of colonization by Russian settlers, were critical to the outburst of violence here in 1916. In this case study, determining which volost’ of the district of Jizzakh were rioting, and which were not, according to a compilation of data drawn from the archival documents published, allows us to come to the conclusion that only half of the volosts in the district saw rioting during the summer of 1916.

in The Central Asian Revolt of 1916
Open Access (free)
Douglas H. Ubelaker, Anne Vega, Tony Platt, and Cloé Drieu

Human Remains and Violence: An Interdisciplinary Journal
A collapsing empire in the age of war and revolution

The 1916 revolt was a key event in the history of Central Asia, and of the Russian Empire in the First World War. This volume is the first comprehensive reassessment of its causes, course and consequences in English for over sixty years. It draws together a new generation of leading historians from North America, Japan, Europe, Russia and Central Asia, working with Russian archival sources, oral narratives, poetry and song in Kazakh and Kyrgyz. These illuminate in unprecedented detail the origins and causes of the revolt, and the immense human suffering which it entailed. They also situate the revolt in a global perspective as part of a chain of rebellions and disturbances that shook the world’s empires, as they crumbled under the pressures of total war.

Aminat Chokobaeva, Cloé Drieu, and Alexander Morrison

The revolt of 1916 in Russian Central Asia was an important part of the First World War and the crisis of imperial globalization. Despite this, it remains little-known and understudied in Anglophone and Francophone scholarship. While there is a rich legacy of Soviet-era publications on the revolt in Russian, these usually bear the strong ideological imprint of the period when they were produced. The post-Soviet period has seen a flowering of new scholarship from Central Asia itself, some of it in Central Asian languages. While much of this continues to use paradigms and terminology inherited from the Soviet period, and interprets the revolt in a series of narrow national frameworks, some of it is also making use of new types of sources, and uncovering voices that were often silent in earlier scholarship – most notably those of the rebels themselves, and the revolt’s many victims. This introduction will give a brief overview of the overall course of the revolt, review the existing historiography, suggest some of the unanswered questions that remain, and explore the new approaches found in the most recent publications and among the contributors to this volume.

in The Central Asian Revolt of 1916