Since the early 2000s, global, underground networks of insurrectionary anarchists have carried out thousands of acts of political violence. This book is an exploration of the ideas, strategies, and history of these political actors that engage in a confrontation with the oppressive powers of the state and capital. The vast majority of these attacks have been claimed via online communiqués through anonymous monikers such as the Informal Anarchist Federation (FAI). The emphasis of the insurrectionary, nihilist-infused anarchism is on creating war-like conditions for opposing capitalism, the state, and that which perpetuates structural violence (e.g. racism, poverty, speciesism, gender roles). To connect the various configurations of post-millennial, insurrectionary resistance, the book explores explore three of its most identifiable components, the FAI, Conspiracy of Cells of Fire (CCF), and emergent networks in Mexico. In his discussion of guerrilla warfare and terrorism, conflict theorist Richard Rubenstein points to a two-stage understanding advocated by Vietnamese leader and military strategist General Vo Nguyen Giap. The book also examines the strategy of Blanquism, the contribution of "classical anarchists," the influence of theorists such as Tiqqun and The Invisible Committee. It seeks to construct the basis for an insurrectionary framework based around a shared politic. The feminist methodology and ethic of research adds a great deal, including a reading of identity politics, standpoint theory, action-orientated research, and embedded, emotive and sincere participatory involvement. The design and methodological intent of the book is to embrace a "militant" form of inquiry which is counter to the project of securitization.
This book focuses on the apparently surprising convergence between anarchism and
eugenics. By tracing the reception of eugenic ideas within five different
anarchist movements –Argentina, England, France, Portugal and Spain – the book
argues that, in fact, there is ample evidence for anarchist interest in, and
implementation of, some form of eugenics. The author argues that this
intersection between anarchism and eugenics can be understood as an emanation
from anarchism’s nineteenth-century legacy, which harnessed science as a means
to change the social world and an ideological commitment to voluntarism as a
political praxis. Through the articulation of interest in birth control,
‘neo-Malthusianism’, freedom to choose for women and revolutionary objectives,
many anarchists across these five countries provided the basis for the creation
of ‘anarchist eugenics’ in the early twentieth century.