Search results

Open Access (free)
Portraying the exhumation and reburial of Polish Jewish Holocaust victims in the pages of yizkor books

-roots efforts by surviving members of hundreds of destroyed Jewish communities. Meant to commemorate these communities, yizkor books were published in small runs, primarily in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, by landsmanshaftn, mutual-aid societies of Jews located mainly in Israel and North America but also in South America, Australia, and various countries in Western Europe who 36   Gabriel N. Finder came from the same town or region in Eastern Europe. Six hundred yizkor books have been published. Ninety per cent pertain to Jewish communities within the borders of interwar

in Human remains and identification
Challenges and technological solutions to the ­identification of individuals in mass grave scenarios in the modern context

, 57 (2012), 47–51. Gonzalez-Rodriguez & Fowler, ‘A study on the discrimination’. Ibid. S. Dillane, M. Thompson, J. Meyer, M. Norquay & R.  C. O’Brien, ‘Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) as a method of species differentiation of bone fragments’, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43 (2011), 297–312. Dillane et  al., ‘Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy’. J. E. Byrd & B. J. Adams, ‘Osteometric sorting of commingled human remains’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48 (2003), 717–24. For example, E. Anastasiou & A

in Human remains and identification
Open Access (free)
A war of extermination, grave looting, and culture wars in the American West

and defeated Native communities on the west coast were unable to protect their ancient village sites. Unauthorized exhumation was not an exclusively American phenomenon. In the 1830s, British scientists brought back Tasmanian Aborigine corpses to London. Hundreds, possibly thousands of Aboriginal remains from Australia ended up in universities and collections in England and Scotland.25 Dutch colonists sent the head of an Ahanta king in Ghana back to the Netherlands in 1838, where it was kept at Leiden University’s Medical Centre until repatriation in 2009.26 By the

in Human remains and identification
Contested narratives of the independence struggle in postconfl ict Timor-Leste

phrase from Chambert-Loir and Reid (2002). The potent dead are ancestors, the veneration of whom confers power and potency to the living, either in an abstract sense (e.g. political legitimatisation by conjuring up the memory of the deceased) or a very ‘real’ sense of passing on mystical powers to the living. A well-publicised example of this was the daring escape of renegade Major Alfredo Reinado, leader of a group of armed mutineers, which also took place in 2007. When surrounded by the Australian Special Air Service (SAS) troops close to Same who were seeking to

in Governing the dead
Open Access (free)
Deaths at sea and unidentified bodies in Lesbos

unsystematic burial of migrants. A member of a local civil society group told us of a relative of a migrant who died on the neighbouring island of Chios. Although he had travelled from Australia and had spent a fortune trying to trace and identify his dead relative, the gravedigger could not remember the precise burial spot, and no systematic data was stored as to which body was buried where. Once a tractor started digging, it became clear that he was buried in a mass grave along with other victims, making identification impossible. The reaction of the islanders to migrant

in Migrating borders and moving times

ignore them, because we didn’t want people to think we were like them.’ Shame in border crossing therefore reflected not only the shameful acts of sexualised performance but was relational to a broader shame of having to make such trips to Romania, ‘the poorer neighbour’. In the Ukrainian context we are dealing with a situation similar to that discussed by Blagg (1997) in his study of the Australian justice system’s inability to employ reintegrative shaming with aborigines. The system’s ability to shame is compromised by its own shameful past treatment of aborigines

in Migrating borders and moving times

Holocaust and the Postmodern (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004); K. Ball, Disciplining the Holocaust (New York: SUNY Press, 2008). See Lemke, Biopolitics, pp. 58–63. D. A. Moses, ‘Genocide and modernity’, in Dan Stone (ed.), The Historiography of Genocide (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 156–93; D. A. Moses, ‘Modernity and the Holocaust’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 43 (1997), pp. 441–5. D. Stone, ‘Biopower and modern genocide’, in A. D. Moses (ed.), Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest Occupation and Subaltern Resistance in World History (New

in Human remains and mass violence
Archives and collecting on the frontiers of data-driven science

Open Science’. Guest Lecture given at the University of South Australia. www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-OyGXgKC38 [accessed February 2018]. Hilgartner, S. and Brandt-Rauf, S.I. 1994. ‘Data Access, Ownership, and Control: Toward Empirical Studies of Access Practices’. Science Communication 15(4): 355–72. Hulme, M. 2014. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ingold, T. 2014. ‘That’s Enough about Ethnography!’ Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4(1): 383–95. Jardine, B. and Kelty, C

in Ethnography for a data-saturated world
Abstract only

is ‘a deconstructive project’, as they put it (2014: 5). Povinelli similarly speaks of ‘the will to be otherwise’ that goes beyond agency-resistance categories. Yet, the very emphasis on ‘otherwise’, on alternative futures and on ‘counterpublics’ holding the potential to bring those about, reveals the analytical project at stake as being one of resistance. Povinelli is interested in the striving that she observes among her Australian aboriginal informants. It makes her wonder: Why does a certain strand of critical theory put such hope in potentiality? … We know

in Politics of waiting
Abstract only

southern Europe and into other parts of the continent. It is now the most dominant form of fandom in Germany, Poland, Greece, Southern France and the Balkans, as well as Indonesia and North Africa. Elements of the ultras style have been adopted in Eastern and Central Europe, Spain, Turkey, Australia, the US, Japan, Scotland and Scandinavia. It is even starting to take root in England, where the 1970s saw the development of hooliganism, a very different approach to the ultras style that was developing in Italy. As a diverse and dynamic culture, theorising the ultras

in Ultras