According to the author, queer as an identification and subjectivity is important to his writing of transnational South Asian art histories. This book talks about new transnational South Asian art histories, to make visible histories of artworks that remain marginalised within the discipline of art history. This is done through a deliberate 'productive failure', by not upholding the strictly genealogical approach. The book discusses authorship by examining the writing about the work of Anish Kapoor to explore the shifting manner in which critics and art historians have identified him and his work. It focuses on the author's own identification as queer and South Asian American to put pressure on the coherency of an LGBTQI art history. It connects formal similarities of abstract work produced in the 1960s in New York City by Cy Twombly and Natvar Bhavsar. The book deals with an art history that concerns facile categories such as South Asian/non-South Asian and black/white, and discusses the works of Stephen Dean, Mario Pfeifer, Adrian Margaret Smith Piper, and Kehinde Wiley. It focuses on practice-led research by discussing 'Sphere:dreamz,; which was produced by queer-identified South Asian women. Continuing the focus, the book looks at the multi-site exhibition 'Mixing It Up: Queering Curry Mile and Currying Canal Street', organised by the author in 2007. It addresses the question of how certain subjects are considered as 'belonging' and others as not; and the role of art in the reconstitution of notions of 'home' and transnational South Asian art histories.
South Asian art histories.
That is, I cannot explore whiteness in relation to what I provisionally refer to
as brownness without acknowledging whiteness’s other: blackness. Dyer writes
that no other colour but white has a complete opposite.3 More specifically, I
explore artworks, their consumption by critics and curators as well as my own
experience viewing them, in person where possible, by four artists: Stephen
Dean (b. 1968), Mario Pfeifer (b. 1981), AdrianMargaretSmithPiper (b. 1948)
and Kehinde Wiley (b. 1977). With the exception of Piper, who is one
Towards creolizing transnational South Asian art histories
Alpesh Kantilal Patel
; German-born and NYCand Berlin-based Mario Pfeifer; NYC-born, Berlin-based AdrianMargaretSmithPiper; and Los Angeles-born, NYC-based Kehinde Wiley. Overall, I
write an art history that disrupts and keeps in play facile categories such as
South Asian/non-South Asian and non-white/white.
The second half of the book, from Chapter 5 onwards, slowly shifts from
deconstruction that dominates the early chapters to what could be described
as ‘practice-led research’: a shift from analyzing the work of others to producing curatorial projects that are then critically reflected
To explore this notion of micro-activism and to expand on my discussion
of opacity, I consider AdrianMargaretSmithPiper’s Imagine [Trayvon Martin]
(2013) (Figure 7.2). Piper moved to Berlin in 2008 when she discovered her
name on a US ‘suspicious travelers’ list.89 She constructed this work after the
acquittal of George Zimmerman – whom she describes as a ‘Euroethnic
Adrian Piper, Imagine [Trayvon Martin], 2013. Digital image for free download and
printing from http://adrianpiper.com/art/index.shtml, 10