Search results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 219 items for :

  • "Charles Darwin" x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All
Abstract only
A study in obsolete patriotism
Author: W.J. Reader

The Victorian private solider was a despised figure. Yet in the first sixteen months of the Great War two and a half million men from the UK and many more from the empire, flocked to the colours without any form of legal compulsion. This book is the result of reflection on one of the most extraordinary mass movements in history: the surge of volunteers into the British army during the first sixteen months of the Great War. The notion that compulsory service in arms was repugnant to British tradition was mistaken. The nation's general state of mind, system of values and set of attitudes derived largely from the upper middle class, which had emerged and become dominant during the nineteenth century. The book examines the phenomenon of 1914 and the views held by people of that class, since it was under their leadership that the country went to war. It discusses the general theoretical notions of the nature of war of two nineteenth-century thinkers: Karl von Clausewitz and Charles Darwin. By 1914 patriotism and imperialism were interdependent. The early Victorians directed their abundant political energies chiefly towards free trade and parliamentary reform. It was the Germans' own policy which jolted the British into unity, for the Cabinet and the nation were far from unanimously in favour of war until the Germans attacked Belgium. Upper-class intellectual culture was founded on the tradition of 'liberal education' at the greater public schools and at Oxford and Cambridge.

Open Access (free)
Four Decisive Challenges Confronting Humanitarian Innovation
Gerard Finnigan and Otto Farkas

resolve them. Notes 1 We wish to thank World Vision National Office staff who have been invaluable in progressing this concept and acknowledge Dr Jonatan Lassa and Associate Professor Akhilesh Surjan from the Disaster and Emergency Management Programme at Charles Darwin University for their critical support

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Sex, sensation and natural selection
Jonathan Smith

Reminiscing about his many visits over the years to the home of his dear friend and scientific colleague Charles Darwin, Joseph Hooker, Britain's leading botanist for much of the second half of the nineteenth century, noted that a regular feature of those visits was joining Darwin on his noontime walk: ‘away we trudged through the garden,’ recalled Hooker, ‘where there was always some experiment to visit’ (F. Darwin 1887 : II. 27). Hooker's description – despite the begrudging ‘trudge’ – captures nicely the multiple roles that the garden

in EcoGothic gardens in the long nineteenth century
David Amigoni

science during the nineteenth century as that century shaded into the twentieth. Wallace had a reputation as both scientist and social radical (Wallace, 1913 ) who had experienced poverty through an underprivileged childhood (Wallace, 1908 ). In 1899, he was still best known for his role in the articulation of the theory of evolution by natural selection, alongside the more prominent, prestigious and socially privileged Charles Darwin in 1858. Evolution was evinced in the ‘wonderful’ selections and adaptations of

in Interventions
Jocelyn Hackforth-Jones

– came to terms with the actuality of the site. Charles Darwin’s trip points to the real challenges posed by this terrain – that it could not be easily accommodated within standard European aesthetic frameworks. He asserted that the Blue Mountains were different from typical European mountainous scenery. He also hinted at the ways in which these mountains challenged European preconceptions of the sublime

in Cultural identities and the aesthetics of Britishness
Abstract only
Clausewitz, Darwin, Henty and others
W.J. Reader

upper intellectual atmosphere, let us glance at two nineteenth-century thinkers, neither likely to be familiar to ordinary Englishmen, unless indirectly and superficially, and far removed from each other in subject-matter. One is Karl von Clausewitz (1780-1831), a Prussian general who served against Napoleon, and the other is Charles Darwin (1809-1882), who came of a numerous family at the centre of the high-Victorian ‘intellectual aristocracy’ (seep. 129 below) of liberal Britain. Clausewitz’s book On War , first published

in 'At duty’s call'
Qāsim Amīn, empire, and saying ‘no’
Murad Idris

Stuart Mill, Herbert Spencer, and Charles Darwin, and to places such as Europe and the United States. These 181 182 182 Colonial exchanges comparisons, I suggest, are selective appropriations, colonial hesitations, and performances for particular audiences. On the other hand, attempts to address distinct audiences across different works, or to appeal to multiple audiences in one work, may not succeed. Authors can fail to calibrate their arguments to their intended audience. Different audiences can interpret one or many texts in numerous ways. And a thinker

in Colonial exchanges
Conversations within and across South Asia
Sushmita Chatterjee, Deboleena Roy, and Banu Subramaniam

In this chapter, three feminist and Science and Technology Scholars discuss the idea of biological politics within the South Asian context. The concepts of biopower and biopolitics emerged within a western frame of Foucauldian theorisations on the technologies of power. As the introduction to this volume suggests, Charles Darwin and Thomas Malthus have played important roles in navigating our conversations regarding bodies and populations in colonial and post-independent India. Yet, the chapter cautions against any easy deployment of biopolitics as a universal theory of how the entanglements of biology and politics play out in the South Asian context. All three scholars have been part of an ongoing project on thinking about biological politics in a South Asian context. The chapter highlights the key issues that emerge, and the many elisions and erasures in the complex histories of science in South Asia. Recent work challenges us to think beyond enlightenment logics in postcolonial contexts. Rather, during colonial and postcolonial times, the colonies have always resisted the imposition of western science resulting not in a pure or universal science but rather complex and hybrid sciences in the postcolony. We explore these tensions and, in particular, the new formations of reproductive labour that are emerging in South Asia.

in Birth controlled
Abstract only

Lewis, Depth of Translation: The Book of Raft, Melbourne: New Music Articles, 1999 . Kelp (with Edmund Carter, Christopher Williams). Exhibition: Hidden Histories, Warrnambool Art Gallery, Victoria, April 2014 . Involutes (with Edmund Carter) 2011). Exhibition: Laminations, Multimedia Room, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina Campus, 15 October 2015 . Graphic art Hinges (with Edmund Carter), 2006. Reference: Paul Carter, ‘Masters of the Gap: art, migration and eido-kinesis’, in C

in Translations, an autoethnography
Protection of animals in nineteenth-century Britain
Author: Diana Donald

This book explores for the first time women’s leading roles in animal protection in nineteenth-century Britain. Victorian women founded pioneering bodies such as the Battersea Dogs’ Home, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, and the first anti-vivisection society. They intervened directly to stop abuses, promoted animal welfare, and schooled the young in humane values via the Band of Mercy movement. They also published literature that, through strongly argued polemic or through imaginative storytelling, notably in Anna Sewell’s Black Beauty, showed man’s unjustifiable cruelty to animals. In all these enterprises, they encountered opponents who sought to discredit and thwart their efforts by invoking age-old notions of female ‘sentimentality’ or ‘hysteria’, which supposedly needed to be checked by ‘masculine’ pragmatism, rationality and broadmindedness, especially where men’s field sports were concerned. To counter any public perception of extremism, conservative bodies such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for long excluded women from executive roles, despite their crucial importance as donors and grassroots activists. However, women’s growing opportunities for public work in philanthropic projects and the development of militant feminism, running in parallel with campaigns for the vote, gave them greater boldness in expressing their distinctive view of animal–human relations, in defiance of patriarchy. In analysing all these historic factors, the book unites feminist perspectives, especially constructions of gender, with the fast-developing field of animal–human history.