This book on Geoffrey Chaucer explores the relationship between Chaucer's poetry and the change and conflict characteristic of his day and the sorts of literary and non-literary conventions that were at his disposal for making sense of the society around him. Critics who consider the social meaning of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales fall into two main schools: those who present his social thought as an expression of the dominant spirit or ideology of his day and those who see Chaucer as possessing a more heterodox voice. Many of the present generation of Chaucer critics have been trained either as 'Robertsonians' or as 'Donaldsonians'. For D. W. Robertson, even those medieval poems which do not explicitly address religious issues were frequently intended to promote the Augustinian doctrine of charity beneath a pleasing surface; for E. Talbot Donaldson, there are 'no such poems in Middle English'. The book sets out the basics of the Augustinian doctrine of charity and of medieval allegorical theory and examines 'patristic' interpretations of Chaucer's work, particularly of the 'Nun's Priest Tale'. It looks at the humanist alternative to the patristic method and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the patristic approach. The book also outlines some of the major medieval discourses about sexual difference which inform Chaucer's depiction of women, in particular, the tendency of medieval writers to polarise their views of women, condemning them to the pit or elevating them to the pedestal.
Gouge, Of Domesticall Duties , p. 289.
I refer to the translation by Richard Aldington, vol. 2
(London: Folio Society, 1957), p. 657.
Aldington, The Decameron , p. 657.
GeoffreyChaucer, CanterburyTales , ed. A. C.
Cawley (London: J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd
incorporated this into his
‘Prologue to the Wife of Bath’s Tale’, where her spirited
attack upon clerical antifeminism – ‘no womman of no clerk is
preysed’ – is part of her vigorous promotion of femininity in a
spiritually satisfying life. GeoffreyChaucer, CanterburyTale s, ed.
A. C. Cawley (London: Dent, 1978), ‘The Wife of Bath’s
Prologue’, p. 176, l. 706.