Cinema has been an object of study for the social sciences for some time now. The relationship between law and cinema has been the subject of a certain number of reflections by jurists who work essentially within a national legal framework, and from the true genre that courtroom movies have become. One can point also to studies linking cinema and international relations. In short, the relationship between international law and cinema has never been the subject of a specific book. The objective of the present book is to show what image of international law and its norms is conveyed in films and series. Beyond a strictly legal analysis, the ambition is to take into account, in a broader perspective marked by interdisciplinarity, the relations between international law, cinema and ideology. The volume is aimed at a readership made of scholars, researchers as well as practitioners, in the field of international law, and related fields, all of whom will benefit from being introduced to a variety of perspectives on core international legal questions present in movies and TV series. Further, the volume can also be used with advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students studying international law, politics and international relations because it will provide the possibility of introducing students to a variety of perspectives on key issues in international law present in movies and TV series.
The foundations of modern
international law are usually traced by Western international lawyers to
the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 at the end of the Thirty Years War. 1 This historical moment
is taken to mark the transition from an imperial and ecclesiastical
order in which the Emperor and the Pope exercised hierarchical authority
over groups and
Representing the first book-length treatment of the application of feminist theories of international law, The boundaries of international law argues that the absence of women in the development of international law has produced a narrow and inadequate jurisprudence that has legitimated the unequal position of women worldwide rather than confronted it. With a new introduction that reflects on the profound changes in international law since the book’s first publication in 2000, this volume is essential reading for scholars, practitioners and students alike.
Williams, ‘Back from the USSR’, 37.
F. R. Tesón, ‘The Kantian TheoryofInternationalLaw’, Columbia Law Review , 92:1 (1992), 67–8;
Laberge, ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, 18.
See S. Axinn, ‘Kant, Authority, and the French
Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas , 32:3 (1971),
179–92; L. W. Beck, ‘Kant and the Right of
Zoller, ‘La Définition des Crimes Contre l’Humanité’, Journal du Droit
International 120 (1993), 549–68, at p. 551.
Darryl Robinson, ‘Defining “Crimes Against Humanity” at the Rome
Conference’, American Journal of International Law 93 (1999), 43–57, at
Yoram Dinstein, ‘Crimes Against Humanity’, in Jerzy Makarczyk (ed.),
TheoryofInternationalLaw at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in
Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski, Kluwer Law International, The
Hague 1996, 891–908, at p. 908.
Phyllis Hwang, ‘Defining Crimes Against Humanity in the Rome
the Klingons in Star Trek: Discovery (Bryan Fuller and Alex Kurtzman, USA, 2017–present) (season 1, episode 2, 2017)).
62 See e.g. Francis Lyall and Paul B. Larsen , Space Law: A Treatise (London: Routledge, 2nd edn, 2018 ) 505–7 (on the concept of ‘metalaw’, a natural law system conceived for the purpose of governing interactions between human beings and intelligent extra-terrestrial life); Robert Kolb, TheoryofInternationalLaw (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016) 61 (on ‘inter-celestial international law’) and Haroldo Valladão, ‘Droit
Strupp , Elements du droit international public ( Rousseau & Co 1927 ); T Lawrence, The Principles of International Law (5th edn, Macmillan, 1910); John Westlake, International Law (Cambridge University Press 1904) 14; D Anzilotti , Scritti di diritto internazionale pubblico ( Cedan Padova , 1956–7 ) 1 , 38 , 95 ff; GI Tunkin , TheoryofInternationalLaw ( Harvard University Press 1974 ) 124 ; C Chaumont , ‘ Cours général de droit international public ’ ( 1970 ) 129 Collected Courses 333 , 440 ; for an attempt to modernise the
International Relations (again)’ ( 2004–5 ) 1 Journal of International Law and International Relations 61 ; Matthew Craven , Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law’ in Anne Orford and Florian Hoffmann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the TheoryofInternationalLaw (Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2016 ) 21 ; Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko , ‘International Law, Literature and Interdisciplinarity’ ( 2015 ) 9 Law and Humanities 103 ; Anne van Aaken , ‘Behavioural International Law and Economics’ ( 2014 ) 55 Harvard
J. E. Noyes, ‘Christianity and Late
Nineteenth-Century British TheoriesofInternationalLaw’, in M. W. Janis
(ed.), The Influence of Religion in the Development of International Law
(Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991), 91–3.
For Bluntschli’s contribution and views see
Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations , 40, 42–7.
Pinto , M. C. W.
( 1996 ). “ Common heritage of
mankind”’: from metaphor to myth, and the
consequences of constructive ambiguity ’, in J.
Makarczyk , ed., TheoryofInternationalLaw at the
Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzystof
Skubiszewski , Cambridge : Cambridge University