Search results

You are looking at 1 - 8 of 8 items for :

  • "comic theory" x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All
Abstract only
Faith, folly, and ‘The Faerie Queene’

Once a byword for Protestant sobriety and moral idealism, Spenser is now better known for his irony and elusiveness. Yet his sense of humour is still underestimated and misunderstood. Challenging the bias behind this neglect, this study shows that humour, far from being peripheral or superficial, goes to the heart of Spenser’s moral and doctrinal preoccupations. It explores rifts between The Faerie Queene’s ambitious and idealising postures and its Protestant vision of corruptible human nature. Figures to be comically ‘undone’ include the hero, the chivalric lover, the virgin, and the ideal monarch – as well as Spenser’s own epic-poet persona. Yet bathos has a positive significance in Christian theology, and Spenserian humour proves to be an expression of tolerance and faith as well as an instrument of satire. On this basis, Comic Spenser contends that the alliance of humour and allegory in The Faerie Queene affirms the value of the creative and ‘errant’ imagination.

Open Access (free)
Comedy, the anti-pastoral and literary politics
David Brauner

Jacobson’s advocacy of comic writing has also manifested itself in the introductions he has written for editions of classic American comic novels such as Leo Rosten’s The Education of Hyman Kaplan ( 1937 ) and Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 ( 1961 ), and for an anthology of James Thurber’s prose, entitled Better to Have Loafed and Lost ( 2002 ) (see Jacobson 2000a , 2004a , 2002f , respectively). 2 There are generally held to be three main schools of comic theory: superiority, relief and incongruity. For a summary of these different schools, see, for example

in Howard Jacobson
Abstract only
Victoria Coldham-Fussell

that response can be a tortuous business. Theories of the comic (which for the most part incorporate laughter but also speak to humour more broadly) have roots in discussions of jokes by classical rhetoricians, and, since the early modern period, have evolved within a range of contexts – moral, medical, philosophical, and psychological. Such diversely motivated attempts to encapsulate the essence of humour have been synthesised, by modern historians of comic theory, into three competing schools of thought, commonly referred to as ‘superiority theory’, ‘incongruity

in Comic Spenser
Abstract only
Victoria Coldham-Fussell

interpretation of that limitation. Central to this study (and to comic theory more generally) is the understanding that comic recognition possesses an affirmative dimension, inextricable from the pleasure it entails, pertaining to the apprehension of limited negative consequences – from pain that is not too painful or ugliness that is not one’s own, to sinfulness that is redeemed. Not coincidentally, there is a strong sense in the Mutabilitie Cantos that whatever limitation Faunus represents, and exposes, is to be celebrated as well as condemned. His folly has undeniably

in Comic Spenser
Abstract only
Indira Ghose

For an overview of this development I am indebted to Stuart M. Tave, The Amiable Humorist: A Study in the Comic Theory and Criticism of the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960 ). 22 Thomas Carlyle, From ‘On Heroes and Hero-Worship and

in Shakespeare and laughter
Celestino Deleyto

history of comic theory, from medieval reformulations of Aristotle and Cicero to film theory’s much more recent interventions. In a sixteenth-century response to one of the many routine puritan attacks on the theatre, Thomas Lodge, author of the source story for Shakespeare’s As You Like It , starts his defence by quoting from the late Roman grammarian Aelius Donatus on the origins of both comedy and tragedy in ritual

in The secret life of romantic comedy
Sarah Leahy and Isabelle Vanderschelden

in Génération Père Noël (Grenier 1994), Veber’s autobiographical account of his unusual career (Veber 2010), and critical writing on comedy in French and in English (e.g. Harris 1998; Moine 2007 ; Lanzoni 2014 ). Some of these sources help to establish direct connections between screenwriting and comic theory (Defays 1996; Critchley 2002; Stott 2005), while others reveal connections with modes of

in Screenwriters in French cinema
Victoria Coldham-Fussell

figure whose ‘personality and style … seemed to give classical authority to the mixture of genres which was a legacy of the Middle Ages’. 142  As Prescott observes, early modern comic theory ‘lagged behind the imaginative complexity of actual practice’; ‘Humour and Satire in the Renaissance’, p. 284. 143   Traité , p. 235 (Book III, Chapter 1), p. 87 (Book I, Chapter 14); Treatise , pp. 95, 44. 144  Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World , pp. 66–7.

in Comic Spenser