This collection explores the role of martial masculinities in shaping nineteenth-century British culture and society in a period framed by two of the greatest wars the world had ever known and punctuated by many smaller conflicts. Bringing together contributions from a diverse range of leading scholars, it offers fresh, interdisciplinary perspectives on an emerging field of study. Chapters in this volume draw on historical, literary, visual and musical sources to demonstrate the centrality of the military and its masculine dimensions in the shaping of Victorian and Edwardian personal and national identities. Focusing on both the experience of military service and its imaginative forms, it examines such topics as bodies and habits, families and domesticity, heroism and chivalry, religion and militarism, and youth and fantasy. The collection is divided into two sections: ‘experiencing’ and ‘imagining’ military masculinities. This division represents the two principal areas of investigation for scholars working in this field. The section on experience considers the realities of military life in this period, and asks to what extent they produced a particular kind of gendered identity. The second section moves on to explore the wider impact of martial masculinities on culture and society, asking whether nineteenth-century Britain can be regarded as a warrior nation. These two sections ultimately demonstrate that the reception, representation and replication of masculine values in Britain during this period was far more complex than might be assumed.
This book is about the processes and practices through which two differently positioned elites, among the colonisers and the colonised, were constituted respectively as the 'manly Englishman' and the 'effeminate Bengali'. It argues that the emerging dynamics between colonial and nationalist politics in the 1880s and 1890s in India is best captured in the logic of colonial masculinity. The figures of the 'manly Englishman' and the 'effeminate Bengali' were thus constituted in relation to colonial Indian society as well as to some aspects of late nineteenth-century British society. These aspects of late nineteenth-century British society are the emergence of the 'New Woman', the 'remaking of the working class', the legacy of 'internal colonialism', and the anti-feminist backlash of the 1880s and 1890s. A sustained focus on the imperial constitution of colonial masculinity, therefore, serves also to refine the standard historical scholarship on nineteenth-century British masculinity. The book traces the impact of colonial masculinity in four specific controversies: the 'white mutiny' against the Ilbert Bill in 1883, the official government response to the Native Volunteer movement in 1885, the recommendations of the Public Service Commission of 1886, and the Indian opposition to the Age of Consent Bill in 1891. In this book, the author situates the analysis very specifically in the context of an imperial social formation. In doing so, the author examines colonial masculinity not only in the context of social forces within India, but also as framed by and framing political, economic, and ideological shifts in Britain.
Urban versus rural in City Slickers and Hunter’s Blood
This chapter builds on my previous interests in the
cinematic countryside and in constructions of urban and rural
masculinities (Bell, 1997 ; 2000 ). It seeks to make a modest contribution to the growing body
of work on gender and the rural, and more specifically on the
relationships between rurality and masculinity (for an overview, see
Little, 2002 ). My aim (to borrow from Rachel
Ballad of Reading Gaol
(1898), and Dorian Gray. As already suggested, one principal
issue at the time which relates to masculinity and desire concerns
visibility and invisibility, it is one which is addressed through
Wilde’s particular construction of Camp.
Thomas A. King has persuasively
argued, in historicist terms, that the performative aspects of Camp
Sherlock Holmes’s association
with an abstracted, instrumental and superior gaze has suggested to
critics the presence of a specifically masculine intellect, one which is
contrasted, in the tales, with images of feminine irrationality. 1 Joseph A. Kestner
in Sherlock’s Men: Masculinity .; Conan Doyle, and
Cultural History (1997) suggests that rationality was
reform in India. Indeed, the Public Service
Commission did more than simply ignore native claims to higher
employment in the public administration in India. Rather, by
reorganising the civil service along the lines of a specifically
sectarian definition of colonial masculinity, which simultaneously
provided a provincial and religious context for native masculinity and an
imperial context for ‘English
This book explores the gendered dynamics of apartheid-era South Africa's militarisation. It analyses the defiance of compulsory military service by individual white men, and the anti-apartheid activism of white men and women in the End Conscription Campaign (ECC), the most significant white anti-apartheid movement of South Africa. Militarized, white masculinity was a dominant model of masculinity that white men were encouraged to perform and white women were encouraged to admire. One of the most consistent features of pre-1994 South African society was progressive militarisation, in terms of both military preparedness and activity and the social conditions necessary for war making. The book then analyses the 1984 Citizenship Act as evidence that conscription was a transformative political act for the men who undertook it. The wider peace movement is also analysed as a transgressive sub-cultural space where radical political subjectivities could be formulated. The ECC's use of art, music and satire is assessed as a means to critique the militarisation of South African society. The role of women in the ECC, the feminist activism and the ways in which constructs of white femininity were addressed are also analysed. The book also explores the interconnections between militarisation, sexuality, race, homophobia and political authoritarianism. Finally, it conceptualises the state as premising its response to objectors on a need to assert and reinforce the gendered binaries of militarisation.
sum, now begun to break down.
In what follows we will examine the
material impact of these worsening socio-economic predicaments through
the lenses of masculinity and rebel populist politics. 10 I argue that, in the absence of any
coherent hegemonic revolutionary ideology, masculinity and its
contradictions was, for those with little prior former political
experience, a central component through which
figure lurking in the cities, that enables politicians, the police, the press and eventually ‘common-sense’ racism, to legitimise the policies necessary to ‘police the crisis’. 7 This chapter analyses political rhetoric, the conservative press and the policing of Black men to unpack the ways in which Black masculinity is framed as deviant, dangerous and alien to Britain. It is contrasted with legitimate white masculinities that manifest themselves through success in the market economy, state power, or the nuclear family. Building on the previous chapter, I argue that
career to date (the 1980s
and 1990s), focus thematically and generically upon male relationships and
foreground certain male actors (Jean Rochefort, Alain Delon, Jean-Paul
Belmondo) in such a way as to contribute to, exploit or skew their existing
star images. In his choice of generic mode, cast and subject matter, Leconte
puts masculinity relentlessly on display.
It is my contention that Leconte’s films demonstrate ways