This book is about the relationship between myth-making and historical materiality. It is a singular case study of the position and experience of women in a 'peripheral' society distanced - geographically, economically and culturally - from the British mainland. The book first looks at women and gender relations in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries through examination of the construction of historical myth. It then looks at economic and demographic factors that underpinned the materiality of women's dominance of culture. An understanding of women's work patterns and experiences is central to any analysis of women's lives in Shetland and the gender relations contingent upon this. Shetland women were autonomous, independent workers whose day-to-day productive experiences implicated them in all sorts of social and economic relationships outside the home. The book argues that women's culture in Shetland actually had only a marginal connection to the islands' dominant economic activity - fishing. It also argues that the negligible figures for children born outside wedlock are a poor guide to understanding the moral order in nineteenth-century Shetland. Like the new visitors to Shetland, the historians of the early twenty-first century would ordinarily reach the same conclusions. They would do so, at root, because the authors are equipped with the same myth system of discourse about what constitutes women's subordination and power. The book seeks to navigate the issue of 'power' by approaching it in terms which the Shetland woman understood in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
and monopolistic distortions. And
as liberal hopes for a pacific and technocratic utopia have taken leave of empirical reality,
the assumption of progress has been sustained primarily through myth-making and cognitive
gymnastics. Fake news is not the antithesis of liberal truth but its progeny.
Nonetheless, the notion of liberal order is useful to the extent that it signals the role of
liberal ideas and politics in the consolidation of Western hegemony and, more specifically, the
expansion of American power. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Four
, community groups and individuals across the state. They also exceptionalise the period, framing it as an extraordinary rupture with what went before; so that by some it is regarded as signifying the overdue abandonment of outmoded allegiances while for others there is nostalgia for the ‘purer’ or more authentic values of the past.
This book analyses and critiques Irish society in the early twenty-first century, but seeks to do so by consciously avoiding myth-making and generalisation. Its authors, through a combination of rigorous theorisation and dedicated
, and even later were often redrawn by the journal’s
London-office artists – as notably by Caton Woodville for the
Illustrated London News 52 – to the conventions of war
illustration, making them more dramatic and heroic.
The Victorian era was one of hero worship and myth-making,
and war correspondents contributed much to the making of popular
military heroes. The press also promoted a cult of the
Physician-publics, citizen-audiences and a half-century of health-care
debates in Canada
Sasha Mullally and Greg Marchildon
This chapter examines five decades of historical writing on, and myth-making
about, the origins of Medicare, Canada’s public health-care system. It
examines interpretations of the 1962 doctors’ strike in Saskatchewan, and
its reception and uptake among physician and citizen audiences. Within the
medical profession, academic and professional elites have vied to capture
attention from Canadian citizen-audiences. A pro-Medicare consensus,
emergent in the 1960s and 1970s, was replaced in the early 2000s by a newly
polarized view, critical of public health care, which reinterprets the
history of the strike action as a form of justified public protest.
This book analyses and critiques Irish society in the early twenty-first century, but seeks to do so by consciously avoiding myth-making and generalisation. It invites readers to revisit and rethink twelve events that span the years 2001-2009. It shows that all of these events reveal crucial intersections of structural power and resistance in contemporary Ireland. The book shows how the events carry traces of both social structure and human agency. They were shaped by overarching political, economic, social and cultural currents; but they were also responses to proposals, protests, advocacy and demands that have been articulated by a broad spectrum of social actors. The book also explores how power works ideologically and through policy instruments to support dominant models of capital accumulation. Identities are constructed at the interface between public policy, collective commitments and individual biographies. They mobilise both power and resistance, as they move beyond the realm of the personal and become focal points for debates about rights, responsibilities, resources and even the borders of the nation itself. The book suggests that conceptions of Irish identity and citizenship are being redrawn in more positive ways. Family is the cornerstone, the natural, primary and fundamental unit group of society. Marriage is the religious, cultural, commercial, and political institution that defines and embeds its values. The book presents a 2004 High Court case taken by Katherine Zappone and Ann Louise Gilligan for legal recognition of their marriage as a same-sex couple, which had taken place a year previously in Canada.
In recent years there has been a significant growth in interest of the so-called “law in context” extending legal studies beyond black letter law. This book looks at the relationship between written law and legal practice. It examines how law is applied in reality and more precisely how law is perceived by the general public in contrast to the legal profession. The authors look at a number of themes that are central to examining ways in which myths about law are formed, and how there is inevitably a constitutive power aspect to this myth making. At the same time they explore to what extent law itself creates and sustains myths. This line of enquiry is taken from a wide range of viewpoints and thus offers a unique approach to the question of relationship between theory and practice. The book critically assesses the public’s level of legal, psychological and social awareness in relation to their knowledge of law and deviant behaviour. This line of enquiry is taken from a wide range of viewpoints and thus offers a unique approach to the question of relationship between theory and practice. The book covers both empirical studies and theoretical engagements in the area of legal understanding and this affords a very comprehensive coverage of the area, and addressing issues of gender and class, as well as considering psychological material. It brings together a range of academics and practitioners and asks questions and address contemporary issues relating to the relationship between law and popular beliefs.
The chapter focuses on the Dadaists’ radical critique of the neo-classical revival promoted by the ‘return to order’ of post-war France and Germany. While the post-war doxa sought to naturalise the body as an organic whole through the cult of the artist Ingres as a model for the reconstituted body of France, the Dadaists displayed the body as artifice, as in Francis Picabia’s pastiches of the nineteenth-century artist, and in Man Ray’s photograph Le Violon d’Ingres (1924), thus exposing the official myth-making policies of post-war France. This is followed by a discussion of the cult of the healthy body forged through sport in the promotion of body-building in Germany in the post-war years, and the subsequent parodic remake in images of sportsmen by Ernst, Baargeld and Grosz.
The foundation myths of late medieval cities and states were never simply
about origins: they were above all about destiny. In the fifteenth century,
the combination of humanist methods and models, newly available source
materials, and changing domestic and international political circumstances
provided the impetus for the continued development of these myths as well as
the creation of new ones. Yet even in Italy, not all eyes looked to Rome.
The Carolingian foundation myth of Florence, in which Charlemagne’s supposed
rebuilding of the city was used to explain the pro-French orientation of the
commune and its Guelph elite, is perhaps the best-known of these myths, but
it is also an example of an Italian city defining itself in relation to a
foreign power. This essay focuses on another element of Quattrocento
myth-making culture: the treatment of northern Italy’s Gaulish past in the
writings of some of the region’s humanists (e.g. Antonio Cornazzano and
Alberto Cattaneo), and the role of these writings in Franco-Milanese
relations before and during the outbreak of the Italian Wars and the French
domination of Milan.
The Indian Rebellion (1857) occupies a central position in the mythology of late nineteenth-century British history. The shock throughout British colonial society was expressed through a medium synonymous with the British experience in India, namely diaries or journals. Differing to accounts from other conflicts of the period, the prolonged and localised nature of fighting at Lucknow and Cawnpore meant that chroniclers represented a cross-section of gender, class and professional status in colonial society, including a range of medical practitioners but also women of various social ranks who had volunteered for medical service. Drawing on printed and manuscript sources from c.1857-c.1900, this chapter argues that the Indian Mutiny diary functions as both a vital record of women’s voices in the history of British colonial experience and a unique example of a nineteenth-century practitioner narrative told from a female perspective. The chapter largely focuses on journals published by participants of the Siege of Lucknow, and will explore the way in which a range of women eyewitnesses acting as nurses were able to participate in the defence of British interests in a time of national emergency thereby contributing to the culture of imperial myth-making that surrounds the Indian Rebellion.