Search results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • "secular aristocratic attitudes" x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All
Essays in honour of Susan Reynolds

This book is dedicated to Susan Reynolds and celebrates the work of a scholar whose views have been central to reappraisals of the position of the laity in the Middle Ages. The themes and concerns include a medieval world in which the activity and attitudes of the laity are not obscured by ideas expressed more systematically in theoretical treatises by ecclesiastics; a world in which lay collective action and thought take centre stage. Reynolds has written her own Middle Ages, especially in her innovative book Kingdoms and Communities whose influence can be seen in so many of the essays. Collectivities, solidarities and collective action are everywhere in these essays, as Reynolds has shown us to expect them to be. Collective action was carried out often in pursuit of social peace, but it existed precisely because there was discord. Of the narratives and interpretative frameworks with which Reynolds's work has been concerned, the book has least to say directly on the debate over feudalism. The book engages many of the themes of Reynolds's work and pursues some of the issues which are prominent in re-examinations of the medieval world and in studies of the medieval laity. It discusses secular aristocratic attitudes towards judicial combat within the broader setting of fictional 'treason trials' of the later twelfth century. Although kinship did not start out as an explicit and overt theme of the book, it emerges as a leitmotiv, perhaps in part because when feudalism is removed, kinship is thrown into sharper relief.

The judicial duel under the Angevin kings (mid–twelfth century to 1204)
Jane Martindale

, although it is difficult to establish a connection conclusively, it seems probable that this survival was bound up with lay attitudes towards judicial combat. Aristocratic laymen, in any case, apparently regarded the duel as an indispensable part of the legal process during the latter part of the twelfth century; the persistence of this attitude and its implications need also to be considered. It is a happy coincidence that Stephen White’s essay in this volume discusses secular aristocratic attitudes towards judicial combat within the broader setting of fictional

in Law, laity and solidarities