Search results
11 Recognition in and of World Society Matthew S. Weinert Why ‘recognition’? The term resonates differently and has distinctive implications depending on its use. The first is grammatical: to recognize something is to comprehend some
Populism, neoliberalism, and globalisation are just three of the many terms used to analyse the challenges facing democracies around the world. Critical Theory and Sociological Theory examines those challenges by investigating how the conditions of democratic statehood have been altered at several key historical intervals since 1945. The author explains why the formal mechanisms of democratic statehood, such as elections, have always been complemented by civic, cultural, educational, socio-economic, and, perhaps most importantly, constitutional institutions mediating between citizens and state authority. Critical theory is rearticulated with a contemporary focus in order to show how the mediations between citizens and statehood are once again rapidly changing. The book looks at the ways in which modern societies have developed mixed constitutions in several senses that go beyond the official separation of legislative, executive, and judicial powers. In addition to that separation, one also witnesses a complex set of conflicts, agreements, and precarious compromises that are not adequately defined by the existing conceptual vocabulary on the subject. Darrow Schecter shows why a sociological approach to critical theory is urgently needed to address prevailing conceptual deficits and to explain how the formal mechanisms of democratic statehood need to be complemented and updated in new ways today.
ICC – individuals or states. With reference to the English School theory, the former will be labelled the world society-oriented subdivision and the latter the international society-oriented strand of legalism. International society The international society-oriented branch of the legalistic discourse embraces the idea that states form the most central point of reference for the establishment of the ICC. According to its advocates, one central feature that specifies the relationship between states and the ICC is that the legitimacy of the ICC as a supra
labour process, cannot be achieved without a corresponding domination over the reproduction of the highest types of labour power (including professional labour). There is acknowledgement in heterodox literature of the need for increased education funding in order to raise the level of labour productivity in Third World societies. However, the question
To rising China writers, the existence of any economic, political or military conflict between the United States and China seems to prove their view that China is a threat to imperialism. However, imperialism has historically driven extremely hard bargains against even the weakest Third World societies using the most belligerent and violent means. Iraq and
Polarisation of labour processes and profit rates between monopoly and non-monopoly firms corresponds to the division between First and Third World societies. As Schwartz writes, A clear qualitative difference divides the industrial activity occurring in the
the Chinese economy takes up a good part of this book. This growth and development is shown to be completely different to how it is presented in the imperialist propaganda and to what most people think. To understand China – the largest Third World society – we need to also understand its relationship to the imperialist societies, as well as to other poor countries. That is, we need an understanding of
characterised by the development of non-monopoly production, while fast, it was still dominated by more advanced capital. China became the most successful practitioner and developer of the non-monopoly labour processes allocated to the periphery within the imperialist-dominated international division of labour. In other words, China’s success is as the Third World society par excellence
, its per capita R & D spend is tiny. However, the biggest problem may not be quantity of spending, but what this money achieves. The starting point for Chinese technological development is essentially the same as for any other Third World society – scientific backwardness in most areas. As Liu Yadong, editor-in-chief of Science and Technology Daily
"Over a hundred years since the beginning of modern imperialism, the former colonial world is still prevented from joining the club of imperialist powers. The gap between rich and poor countries is not narrowing but growing. China is usually presented as challenging the dominance of the United States and other rich countries. However, imperialist domination over the most sophisticated aspects of the labour process gives the rich countries and their corporations control over the global labour process as a whole – including in China. Third World producers are forced to specialise in the opposite types of work – in relatively simple and low-end labour, for which major price markups and large profits are rarely possible. This is the kernel of unequal exchange in world trade. The imperialist system develops two types of capital – monopoly and non-monopoly capital – and two types of societies – rich, monopoly, imperialist societies and poor, non-monopoly, ‘Third World’ societies. China’s ascendance to become the most powerful Third World country in no way threatens to topple continuing imperialist dominance. Most contemporary Marxist writing has not been focused on global income polarisation and imperialist exploitation of the poor countries. For this reason, it has been unable to explain how exactly the same countries continuously reproduce their dominance. However, the actual conditions of the neoliberal world economy have made explicit how this happens through the labour process itself. In doing so it has also shown how Marx’s labour theory of value can be concretely applied to the conditions of monopoly capital today.