This handbook is written for patients and members of the public who want to understand more about the approaches, methods and language used by health-services researchers. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is now a requirement of most major health-research programmes, and this book is designed to equip these individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary for meaningful participation. Edited by award-winning mental-health researchers, the book has been produced in partnership with mental-health-service users and carers with experience of research involvement. It includes personal reflections from these individuals alongside detailed information on quantitative, qualitative and health-economics research methods, and comprehensively covers all the basics needed for large-scale health research projects: systematic reviews; research design and analysis using both qualitative and quantitative approaches; health economics; research ethics; impact and dissemination. This book was developed during a five-year research programme funded by the UK’s National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) called Enhancing the Quality of User Involved Care Planning in Mental Health Services (EQUIP). The handbook clearly outlines research practices, and gives an insight into how public and patient representatives can be involved in them and shape decisions. Each chapter ends with a reflective exercise, and there are also some suggested sources of additional reading. People who get involved in health research as experts from experience now have a textbook to support their research involvement journey.
Advertising Standards Authority (2014) ‘Making ads clear: the challenge for advertisers and vloggers’. Retrieved 25 March 2015 at: http://asa.org.uk/News-resources/Media-Centre/2014/Making-ads-Clear-Thechallenge-for-advertisers-and-vloggers.aspx#.VRKY1o4l8vZ.
Agar, J. (2012) Science in the Twentieth Century and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Agsten, A. (2014) ‘Five years of public engagement’ (Los Angeles: Hammer Museum). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: http://hammer.ucla.edu/blog/2014/06/five-years-of-public-engagement/.
AHRC (2015) ‘Connected communities’. Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: www.ahrc.ac.uk/Funding-Opportunities/Research-funding/Connected-Communities/Pages/Connected-Communities.aspx.
Alsop, S. and Watts, M. (1997) ‘Sources from a Somerset village: a model for informal learning about radiation and radioactivity’, Science Education, 81:6 633–50.
Alston, A. (2013) ‘Audience participation and neoliberal value: risk, agency and responsibility in immersive theatre’, Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 18:2 128–38.
Amabile, T.M. (1996) Creativity in Context (Oxford: Westview Press).
Anderson, D. (2003) ‘Visitors’ long-term memories of world expositions’, Curator, 46:4 401–20.
Anker, S. and Nelkin, D. (2004) The Molecular Gaze, Art in the Genetic Age (Cold Spring Harbour, NY: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press).
Anon (nd) What is ‘extreme citizen science?’ Retrieved 27 July 2015 at: www.ucl.ac.uk/excites/home-columns/full-what-is-extreme-citizen-science.
Anon (nd, b) ‘Jack the Ripper 125’. Retrieved 1 December 2015 at: www.watershed.co.uk/dshed/jack-ripper-125-jtr125.
Anon (2012) Life Online (Brussels, European Commission).
Arora, P. (2012) ‘Typology of Web 2.0 spheres: understanding the cultural dimensions of social media spaces’,Current Sociology, 60:5 599–618.
Arrasvuori, J., Boberq, M., Holopainen, J., Korhonen, H., Lucero, A. and Montola, M. (2011) ‘Applying the PLEX Framework in designing for playfulness’, DPPI ’11, Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, June 22–25, Milano, Italy, Article 24. doi: 10.1145/2347504.2347531.
Attfield, R. (2012) Ethics: An Overview (London: Continuum).
Audience Agency (2014) Audience Spectrum Overview (London: The Audience Agency). Retrieved 15 January 2015 at: http://audiencefinder.org/audience/audience-spectrum-summary.
Australia Council for the Arts (2010) More than Bums on Seats: Australian Participation in the Arts. (Surrey Hills, NSW: Australian Council for the Arts). Retrieved 14 July 2014 at: www.australiacouncil.gov.au/resources/reports_and_publications/subjects/audiences_and_cultural_participation/arts_participation_research_more_than_bums_on_seats.
Australian Research Council (2014) Research Impact Principles and Framework (Canberra: Australian Government). Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: www.arc.gov.au/general/impact.htm.
Bakker, P. (2014) ‘Mr. Gates returns: curation, community management and other new roles for journalists’, Journalism Studies, 15:5 596–606.
Barbour, K. and Marshall, D. (2012) ‘The academic online: constructing persona through the world wide web’, First Monday, 17:9.
Barnett, C. and Mahony, N. (2011) Segmenting Publics (Swindon: ESRC/ NCCPE).
Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P. and Tinkler, J. (2014) The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference (London: Sage).
Baym, N.K. (2009) ‘A call for grounding in the face of blurred boundaries’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14:3 720–3.
Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2008) The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2010) ‘Beyond the “toolkit approach”: arts impact evaluation research and the realities of cultural policy‐making’, Journal for Cultural Research, 14:2 121–42.
Bennett, T. (1995) The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics (Oxon: Routledge).
Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (2008) ‘Introduction’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 1–10.
Bernhardt, J.M., Mays, D. and Kreuter, M.W. (2011) ‘Dissemination 2.0: closing the gap between knowledge and practice with new media and marketing’, Journal of Health Communication, 16 32–44.
Bertucci, P. (2008) ‘Domestic spectacles: electrical instruments between business and conversation’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 11–24.
Bienkowski, P. (2014) Communities and Museums as Active Partners: Emerging Learning from the Our Museum Initiative (London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation).
Bik, H.K. and Goldstein, M.C. (2013) ‘An introduction to social media for scientists’, PLOS Biology, 11:4 e1001535.
Birch, H. and Weitkamp, E. (2010) ‘Podologues: conversations created by science podcasts’, New Media & Society, 12:6 889–909.
Bjur, J., Christian Schrøder, K., Hasebrink, U., Courtois, C., Adoni, H. and Nossek, H. (2014) ‘Cross-media use – unfolding complexities in contemporary audiencehood’, in Carpentier, N., Christian Schrøder, K. and Hallett, L. (eds), Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity (New York: Routledge) pp. 15–29.
Blum, D., Knudson, M. and Henig, R.M. (2006) A Field Guide for Science Writers, second edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Boden, M.A. (2004) The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, second edition (London: Routledge).
Bogenschneider, K. and Corbett, T. (2010) Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-minded researchers and Research-minded policy-makers (New York: Routledge).
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. and Wilderman, C.C. (2009) Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing its Potential for Informal Science Education: A CAISE Inquiry Group Report (Washington DC: CAISE) 1–58.
Borgonovi, F. (2004) ‘Performing arts attendance: an economic approach’, Applied Economics, 36:17 1871–85.
Bowater, L. and Yeoman, K. (2013) Science Communication: A Practical Guide for Scientists (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell).
Boyd Davies, S. (2009) ‘Introduction to the special issue on creative evaluation’, Digital Creativity, 20:3 133–9.
Braga, R., Gemignani Garcia, S. and Mello e Silva, L. (2008) ‘Public sociology and public engagement’, Current Sociology, 56:3 415–24.
Braun, K. and Schultz, S. (2010) ‘“… a certain amount of engineering involved”: constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements’, Public Understanding of Science, 19:4 403–19.
Brennan, L., Binney, W., Parker, L., Aleti, T. and Nguyen, D. (2014) ‘Social marketing and behaviour change: where to from here?’, in Brennan, L., Binney, W., Parker, L., Aleti, T. and Nguyen, D. (eds) Social Marketing and Behaviour Change: Models, Theories and Applications (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited) pp. 331–5.
Bright Club (2014) ‘Bright Club: researchers become comedians for just one night’. Retrieved 3 December 2014 at www.brightclub.org/.
Brock, C. (2006) ‘The public worth of Mary Somerville’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 39:2 255–72.
Brodzinski, E. (2010) Theatre in Health and Care (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Broks, P. (2006) Understanding Popular Science (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
Brook, O. (2011) International Comparisons of Public Engagement in Culture and Sport (London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport/ESRC).
Bruner, J. (2013) ‘Tweets loud and quiet’, Radar. Retrieved 3 March 2015 at: http://radar.oreilly.com/2013/12/tweets-loud-and-quiet.html.
Bruns, A. (2006) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond, From Production to Produsage (Oxford: Peter Lang).
Bultitude, K. (2010) ‘Presenting science’, in Brake, M. and Weitkamp, E. (eds) Introducing Science Communication (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp. 128–53.
Bultitude, K., McDonald, D. and Custead, S. (2011) ‘The rise and rise of science festivals: an international review of organised events to celebrate science’, International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 1:2 165–88.
Bultitude, K. and Sardo, A.M. (2012) ‘Leisure and pleasure: science events in unusual locations’, International Journal of Science Education, 34:18 2775–95.
Burall, S. and Shahrokh, T. (2010) What the Public Say: Public Engagement in National Decision-Making (London: Sciencewise-ERC).
Burawoy, M. (2005) ‘For public sociology’, American Sociological Review, 70:1 4–28.
Burgess, J. (2006) ‘Hearing ordinary voices: cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling’, Continuum, 20:2 201–14.
Burningham, K., Barnett, J., Carr, A., Clift, R. and Wehrmeyer, W. (2007) ‘Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge: a qualitative investigation of practice in the UK chemicals industry’, Public Understanding of Science, 16:1 23–43.
Bushell, G. (2015) ‘Cascade – Science in games’. Retrieved 1 December 2015 at: www.fayju.com/blog/2015/04/cascade-science-in-games.
Cabinet Office (1999) Modernising Government (London: The Stationery Office).
Cahill, C. and Torre, M.E. (2007) ‘Beyond the journal article: representations, audience and the presentation of Participatory Action Research’, in Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place (Abdingdon: Routledge) pp. 196–206.
Calhoun, C. (2009) ‘Academic freedom: Public knowledge and the structural transformation of the university’, Social Research, 76:2 561–98.
Cameron, D., Pope, S. and Clemence, M. (2014) Dialogue on Data: Exploring the Publics View’s on Using Administrative Data for Research Purposes (London: IPSOS Mori).
Carpentier, N., Christian Schrøder, K. and Hallett, L. (2014a) ‘Audience/ society transformations’, in Carpentier, N., Christian Schrøder, K. and Hallett, L. (eds), Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity (New York: Routledge) pp. 1–12.
Carpentier, N., Dahlgren, P. and Pasquali, F. (2014b) ‘The democratic (media) revolution: a parallel genealogy of political and media participation’, in Carpentier, N., Christian Schrøder, K. and Hallett, L. (eds) Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity (New York: Routledge) pp. 123–41.
Carrozzino, M. and Bergamasco, M. (2010) ‘Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums’, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11:4 452–8.
Chalkstream Communications (2014) Science Public Relations and Communication (Tring: Chalkstream Communications).
Chalmers, M. (2009) ‘Communicating physics in the information age’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds.), Practising Science Communication in the Information Age: Theorising Professional Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 67–80.
Charter, M. and Keiller, S. (2014) ‘Grassroots innovation and the circular economy: a global survey of repair cafes and hackerspaces’. Retrieved 20 July 2015 at: http://cfsd.org.uk/site-pdfs/circular-economyand-grassroots-innovation/Survey-of-Repair-Cafes-and-Hackerspaces.pdf.
Chilvers, J. (2008) ‘Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practices’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 33:2 421–51.
Collins, H. (2014) Are We All Scientific Experts Now? (Cambridge: Polity).
Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. (2002) ‘The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience’, Social Studies of Science, 32:2 235–96.
Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. (2007) Rethinking Expertise (London: The University of Chicago Press).
Cook, G., Pieri, E. and Robbins, P.T. (2004) ‘The scientists think and the public feels: expert perceptions of the discourse of GM food’, Discourse and Society, 15:4 433–49.
Craft, A. (2003) ‘The limits to creativity in education: dilemmas for the educator’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 51:2 113–27.
Cramb, A. (2014) ‘Academic becomes instant hit on Twitter with Lego’s female scientist figures’, Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 13 March 2015 at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11031828/Academic-becomesinstant-hit-on-Twitter-with-Legos-female-scientist-figures.html.
Crest Network, The (2015) Voice by Choice (Crest Network, The University of York/University of Hull). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: http://crestnetwork.org.uk/page/voice-by-choice.
Crick, T. and Winfield, A. (2013) ‘Academic blogging – 10 top tips’. Retrieved 3 March 2015 at: www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/dec/13/how-to-academic-blogging-tips.
Crosland, M. (2001) ‘Popular science and the arts: challenges to cultural authority in France under the Second Empire’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 34:3 301–22.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996) Creativity (New York: HarperCollins).
Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1986) ‘Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design’, Management Science, 32:5 554–71.
Dahlstron, M.F. and Ho, S.S. (2012) ‘Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science,’ Science Communication, 34:5 592–617.
Dallas, D. (2006) ‘Café Scientifique – déjà vu’, Cell, 126:2 227–9.
Davies, G. (2006) ‘Mapping deliberation: calculation, articulation and intervention in the politics of organ transplantation’, Economy and Society, 35:2 232–58.
Davies, S. and Hosein, G. (2006) ‘Hang together – or we will hang separately’, Times Higher Education Supplement (17 February). Retrieved 18 March 2015 at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=201402.
Davies, S.R. (2008) ‘Constructing communication: talking to scientists about talking to the public’, Science Communication, 29:4 413–34.
Davies, S.R., McCallie, E., Simonsson, E., Lehr, J.L. and Duensing, S. (2009) ‘Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy’, Public Understanding of Science, 18:3 338–53.
Dawson, E. (2014a) ‘Equity in informal science education: developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres’, Studies in Science Education, 50:2 209–47.
Dawson, E. (2014b) ‘“Not designed for us”: how science museums and science centres socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups’, Science Education, 98:6 981–1008.
DeBoer, G.E. (2000) ‘Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37:6 582–601.
DeBok, C. and Steinhaus, N. (2008) ‘Breaking out of the local: international dimensions of science shops’, Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 1, 165–78.
Déotte, J.L. (2004) ‘Rome, the archetypal museum, and the Louvre, the negation of division’, in Preziosi, D. and Farago, C. (eds), Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 51–64.
DePoy, E. and Gilson, S. (2008) Evaluation Practice (New York: Routledge).
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. and Nacke, L. (2011) ‘From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”’, ACM, Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9–15.
Dickert, N. and Sugarman, J. (2005) ‘Ethical goals of community consultation in research’, American Journal of Public Health, 95:7 1123–7.
Dietz, S. (2005) ‘Fair assembly’, in Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) pp. 910–15.
D’Ignazio, C., Warren, J. and Blair, D. (2014) ‘Less is more: the role of small data for governance in the 21st Century’, in Pimenta, M.S. and Canabarro, D.R., Governancia Digital (UFRGS Editoria). Retrieved 20 July 2015 at: www.ufrgs.br/cegov/files/livros/gtdigital.pdf.
Ding, Y., Du, Y., Hu, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Ross, K. and Ghose, A. (2011) ‘Broadcast yourself: understanding YouTube uploaders’, Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) 2011, Berlin, 361–70.
Djorgovski, S.G., Hut, P., Knop, R., Longo, G., McMillan, S., Vesperini, E., Donalek, C., Graham, M., Mahabal, A., Sauer, F., White, C. and Lopes, C. (2012) ‘The MICA experiment: astrophysics in virtual worlds’, Proceedings of the SLACTIONS 2012 International Research Conference on Virtual Worlds. arXiv:1301.6808 [astro-ph.IM].
Donnelly, A., Crowe, O., Regan, E., Begley, S. and Caffarra, A. (2014) ‘The role of citizen science in monitoring biodiversity in Ireland’, International Journal of Biometeorology, 58:6 1237–49.
Doubleday, R. (2009) ‘Ethical codes and scientific norms: the role of communication in maintaining the social contract for science’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scalon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds), Practising Science Communication in the Information Age (Oxford: Oxford University Press/The Open University) pp. 19–34.
Dougherty, D. (2014) ‘An in depth study of makers at the forefront of hardware innovation’. Retrieved 21 July 2015 at: http://makerfairelisbon.com/assets/docs/makerstudy2014.pdf.
Dowell, E. and Weitkamp, E. (2010) ‘An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science’, Public Understanding of Science, 21:7 891–901.
DuBois, J.M. (2006) ‘Ethics in behavioural and social science research’, in Smith Iltis, A. (ed.) Research Ethics (New York: Routledge) pp. 102–20.
Dufau, S., Dunabeitia, J.A., Moret-Tatay, C., McGonigal, A., Peeters, D., Alario, F., Balota, D.A., Brysbaert, M., Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Ktori, M., Perea, M., Rastle, K., Sasburg, O., Yap, M.J., Ziegler, J.C. and Grainger, J. (2011) ‘Smart phone, smart science: how the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science’, PLoS ONE, 6:9 e24974.
Duncan, C. (2004) ‘From the princely gallery to the public art museum: the Louvre museum and the National Gallery, London’, in Preziosi, D. and Farago, C. (eds) Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 250–77.
Dunn, S. and Hedges, M. (2013) ‘Crowd-sourcing as a component of humanities research infrastructures’, International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7:1–2 147–69.
Durant, J. (2013) ‘The role of science festivals’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110:8 2681.
Eagle, L., Dahl, S., Hill, S., Bird, S., Spotswood, F. and Tapp, A. (2013) Social Marketing (Harlow: Pearson).
Ede, S. (2008) Art and Science (London: I.B. Tauris).
Edwards, D. (2008) Artscience: Creativity in the post-Google generation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Eisenbeiss, M., Blechenschmidt, B., Backhaus, B. and Freund, P.A. (2012) ‘“The (real) world is not enough:” motivational drivers and user behavior in virtual worlds’, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26:1 4–20.
Elamon, J., Franke, R.W. and Ekbal, B. (2004) ‘Decentralization of health services: the Kerala people’s campaign’, International Journal of Health Services, 34:4 681–708.
Eliaeson, S. and Kalleberg, R. (2008) ‘Academics as public intellectuals’, in Eliaeson, S. and Kalleberg, R. (eds) Academics as Public Intellectuals (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing) pp. 1–16.
EPSRC (2014) ‘Framework for responsible innovation’ (Swindon: EPSRC). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework/.
European Commission (2008) Scientific Evidence for Policy-Making (Brussels: European Commission).
European Commission (2012) Monitoring Policy and Research Activities on Science in Society in Europe (MASIS) (Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Research and Innovation).
European Commission (2014) ‘European Researchers’ Night: one night, several hundred cities all over Europe and beyond’. Retrieved 3 December 2014 at http://ec.europa.eu/research/researchersnight/index_en.htm.
European Commission (2015) ‘Science Shops, knowledge for the community’. Retrieved 21 July 2015 at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/science_shop_en.pdf.
Ewins, R. (2005) ‘Who are you? Weblogs and academic identity’, E-Learning and Digital Media, 2:4 368–77.
Eyre, C. (2014) ‘Teens flock to Movellas “immersive experience”’, The Bookseller, 5632 12–13.
Falk, J.H. (2000) ‘Assessing the impact of museums’, Curator, 43:1 5–7.
Falk, J.H. (2011) ‘Contextualizing Falk’s identity-related visitor motivation model’, Visitor Studies, 14:2 141–57.
Falk, J.H., Moussouri, T. and Coulson, D. (1998) ‘The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning’, Curator, 41:2 107–20.
Falk, J.H., Storksdieck, M. and Dierking, L.D. (2007) ‘Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning’, Public Understanding of Science, 16:4 455–69.
Fauville, G., Dupont, S., von Thun, S. and Lundin, J. (2015) ‘Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy’, Computers & Education, 82 60–73.
Featherstone, H., Wilkinson, C. and Bultitude, K. (2009) Public Engagement Map: Report to the Science for All Expert Group (Bristol: University of the West of England).
Featherstone, H. and Pope, H. (2011) MS: The Big Knit, Evaluation Report. Retrieved 26 June 2014 at: http://knitaneuron.blogspot.co.uk/.
Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (2008) ‘The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation’, Science and Public Policy, 35:7 489–99.
Festa Literária Internacional de Paraty (2015) ‘Flip Paraty International Literary Festival’ (Paraty: Festa Literária Internacional de Paraty). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: www.flip.org.br/?idioma_new=I.
Findlen, P. (1994) Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Fogg-Rogers, L., Bay, J., Burgess, H. and Purdy, S.C. (2015) ‘“Knowledge is power”: a mixed methods study exploring adult audience preferences for engagement and learning formats over three years of a health science festival’, Science Communication, 37:4 419–51.
Fox, S. and Madden, M. (2006) ‘Riding the waves of “Web 2.0”’. Retrieved 13 March 2015 at: www.pewinternet.org/2006/10/05/riding-the-waves-of-web-2–0/.
Fox, S. and Rainie, L. (2014) ‘The Web at 25 in the U.S.’ (Washington: Pew Research Centre). Retrieved 13 March 2015: www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s/.
Frankel, F. and Whitesides, G.M. (2007) On the Surface of Things, Images of the Extraordinary in Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Franklin, B. (2014) ‘The future of journalism’, Journalism Studies, 15:5 481–99.
Frost, C. (2010) Reporting for Journalists (Abingdon: Routledge).
Fuchs, C. (2014) Social Media: A Critical Introduction (London: Sage).
Fukushima, M. (2005) ‘On small devices of thought: concepts, etymology and the problem of translation’, in Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) pp. 58–63.
Furedi, F. (2004) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? second edition (London: Continuum).
Galison, P., Moss, R. and Students (2005) ‘Wall of science’, in Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press) pp. 332–3.
Galloway, S. (2009) ‘Theory‐based evaluation and the social impact of the arts’, Cultural Trends, 18:2 125–48.
Gammon, B. and Burch, A. (2006) ‘A guide for successfully evaluating science engagement events’, in Turney, J. (ed). Engaging Science: Thoughts, Deeds, Analysis and Action (London: Wellcome Trust) pp. 80–5.
Garrett, J.M. and Bird, S.J. (2000) ‘Ethical issues in communicating science’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 6:4 435–42.
Gastil, J. and Richards, R. (2013) ‘Making direct democracy deliberative through random assemblies’, Politics & Society, 41:2 253–81.
Gauntlett, D. (2011) Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. (Cambridge: Polity).
Gaventa, J. and Barrett, G. (2010) ‘So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement’, Research Summary of Working Paper 347 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).
Gay, P.L., Price, A. and Searle, T. (2006) ‘Astronomy podcasting: a low-cost tool for affecting attitudes in diverse audiences’, Astronomy Education Review, 5:1 36–52.
Glinkowski, P. and Bamford, A. (2009) Insight and Exchange: An Evaluation of the Wellcome Trust’s Sciart Programme (London: Wellcome Trust). Retrieved 17 June 2014 at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Public-engagement/Sciart-evaluation-report/index.htm.
Goldacre, B. (2008) Bad Science (London: Fourth Estate).
Graham, E.A., Henderson, S. and Schloss, A. (2011) ‘Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research’, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 92:38 313–15.
Grand, A. (2009) ‘Engaging through dialogue: international experiences of Cafe Scientifique’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age: Theorising Professional Practices (Oxford University Press/Open University Press: Oxford) pp. 209–26.
Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K. and Winfield, A. (2014) ‘Mapping the hinterland: data issues in open science’, Public Understanding of Science, online first, doi: 10.1177/0963662514530374.
Grant, J., Brutscher, P.B., Kirk, S.E., Butler, L. and Wooding, S. (2010) Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international practice (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation). Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/documented_briefings/2010/RAND_DB578.pdf.
Grauerholz, L. and Baker-Sperry, L. (2007) ‘Feminist research in the public domain: risks and recommendations,’ Gender and Society, 21:2 272–94.
Gregory, J. (2009) ‘Scientists communicating’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age: Theorising Professional Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 3–18.
Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility (Cambridge: Basic Books).
Griffiths, A. (2008) Shivers Down Your Spine: Cinema, Museums and the Immersive View (New York: Columbia University Press).
Gustavsen, B. (1986) ‘Social research as participative dialogue’, in Heller, F. (ed), The Use and Abuse of Social Science (London: Sage Publications) pp. 143–56.
Gutmann, A. and Wagner, J. (2011) ‘Ethically Impossible’: STD Research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948 (Washington D.C.: Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues).
Hagendijk, R. and Irwin, A. (2006) ‘Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe’, Minerva, 44:2 167–84.
Hammersley, M. (2004) ‘A new political arithmetic to make sociology useful? Comments on a debate’, British Journal of Sociology, 55:3 439–45.
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L. and Sonnenwald, D.H. (2003) ‘An emerging view of scientific collaboration: scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54:10 952–65.
Haran, B. and Poliakoff, M. (2011) ‘How to measure the impact of chemistry on the small screen’, Nature Chemistry, 3 180–1.
Hassouneh, D. and Brengman, M. (2014) ‘A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users’, Computers in Human Behaviour, 33 330–8.
Heinelt, H. (2010) Governing Modern Societies: Towards Participatory Governance (London: Routledge).
Held, D. (2006) Models of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Heller, F. (1986) ‘Introduction and overview’, in Heller, F. (ed.), The Use and Abuse of Social Science (London: Sage Publications) pp. 1–18.
Heller, P., Harilal, K.N. and Chaudhuri, S. (2007) ‘Building local democracy: evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India’, World Development, 35:4 626–48.
Henning, M. (2006) Museums, Media and Cultural Theory (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
Hewer, S. (2003) Ask the Audience: Investigating the Impact of Science and Art Exhibitions on Their Audience. A Report for The Wellcome Trust. Retrieved 11 July 2014 at: www.takingpartinthearts.com/content.php?content=1002.
Hilton, C. (2014) ‘The immortalisation of Billy Apple: an art–science collaboration’, Leonardo, 47:2 109–13.
Hitchcock, T. (2014) ‘Twitter and blogs are not add-ons to academic research, but a simple reflection of the passion that underpins it’. Retrieved 3 March 2015 at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/07/28/twitter-and-blogs-academic-public-sphere/.
Hoffmann, R. (2003) ‘Thoughts on aesthetics and visualisation in chemistry’, Hyle – International Journal of Philosophy of Chemistry, 9:1 7–10.
Hoggarth, L. and Comfort, H. (2010) A Practical Guide to Outcome Evaluation (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).
Holden, J. (2006) Cultural Value and the Crisis of Legitimacy: Why Culture Needs a Democratic Mandate (London: Demos). Retrieved 2 July 2014 at: www.demos.co.uk/publications/culturallegitimacy.
Holliman, R. and Jensen, E. (2009) ‘(In)authentic sciences and (im)partial publics: (re)constructing the science outreach and public engagement agenda’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 35–52.
Holmwood, J. (2014) ‘This turbulent and challenging time’, Network, 116, 20–1 (Durham: British Sociological Association).
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1992) Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge (London: Routledge).
Horlick-Jones, T., Rowe, G. and Walls, J. (2007) ‘Citizen engagement processes as information systems: the role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality’, Public Understanding of Science, 16:3 259–78.
Hornig Priest, S. (2009) ‘Reinterpreting the audiences of media messages about science’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 223–36.
Horst, M. (2008) ‘In search of dialogue: staging science communication in consensus conferences’, in Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B. and Shi, S. (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New models, New Practices (New York: Springer) pp. 259–74.
Hourston Hanks, L., Hale, J. and MacLeod, S. (2012) ‘Introduction: museum making, the place of narrative’, in MacLeod, S., Hourston Hanks, L. and Hale, J. (eds) Museum Making: Narratives, Architectures and Exhibitions (London: Routledge) p. xix.
Hudson, K. (1975) A Social History of Museums (London: The Macmillan Press).
Huizinga, J. (2014) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture (Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books).
Hüppauf, B. and Weingart, P. (2008) ‘Images in and of science’, in Hüppauf, B. and Weingart, P. (eds) Science Images and Popular Images of Scientists (New York: Routledge) pp. 3–32.
ICOM (2014) ‘International Council of Museums, frequently asked questions’. Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: http://icom.museum/resources/frequently-asked-questions/.
InsightsNow (2012) Seven Shades of Mobile. Retrieved 8 October 2014 at: www.insightsnow.com/blog/DOWNLOAD-the-Award-Winning-AOL-Case-History.
International Association of Public Participation (2007) ‘IAP2 spectrum of public participation’. Retrieved 18 March 2015 from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/imported/IAP2percent-20Spectrum_vertical.pdf.
Ipsos MORI (2014) Public Attitudes to Science (London: Ipsos MORI, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and ESRC).
Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science (London: Routledge).
Irwin, A. (2001) ‘Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in biosciences’, Public Understanding of Science, 10:1 1–18.
Irwin, A. (2006) ‘The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance’, Social Studies of Science, 36:2 299–320.
Irwin, A. (2009) ‘Moving forwards or in circles? Science communication and scientific governance in an age of innovation’, in Holliman, R., Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (eds), Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 3–17.
Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (2014) Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe (Rome: Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: www.sis-rri-conference.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RomeDeclaration.pdf.
ITU (2014a) ‘ICT facts and figures’. Retrieved 8 October 2014 at: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2014-e.pdf.
ITU (2014b) ‘Measuring the Information Society’. Retrieved 13 March 2015 at: www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/.
Jensen, E. (2013) ‘Reconsidering The Love of Art: evaluating the potential of art museum outreach’, Visitor Studies, 16:2 144–59.
Jensen, E. and Buckley, N. (2012) ‘Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research’, Public Understanding of Science, 23:5 557–73.
John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stocker, G. and Wales, C. (2011) Nudge. Nudge, Think, Think: Using Experiments to Change Civic Behaviour (London: Bloomsbury Academic).
Joppien, R. and Smith, B. (1998) The Art of Captain Cook’s Voyage, Vol 3, Text. The Voyage of the Resolution and Discovery 1776–1780 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Kac, E. (2007) Signs of Life, BioArt and Beyond (Boston: MIT Press).
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) ‘Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media’, Business Horizons, 53 59–68.
Kappas, A. and Krämer, N.C. (2011) Face-to-Face Communication over the Internet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Keith, M. (2008) ‘Public sociology? Between heroic immersion and critical distance: personal reflections on academic engagement with political life’, Critical Social Policy, 28:3 320–34.
Kemp, M. (2006) Seen/Unseen: Art, Science and Intuition from Leonardo to the Hubble Telescope (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Kera, D. (2012) ‘NanoSmano Lab in Ljubljana: disruptive prototypes and experimental governance of nanotechnologies in hackerspaces.’ JCOM 11:4 C03.
Kerr, A. (2003) ‘Rights and responsibilities in the new genetics era’, Critical Social Policy, 23:2 208–26.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Tutton, R. (2007) ‘Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public dialogue’, Social Studies of Science, 37:3 385–411.
Kidd, J. (2012) ‘The museum as narrative witness: heritage performance and the production of narrative space’, in Macleod,S., Hourston Hanks, L. and Hale,J. (eds) Museum Making: narratives, architectures, exhibitions (London: Routledge) pp. 74–82.
Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (2007) ‘Introduction: connecting people, participation and place’, in Kindon, S., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (eds) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place (Abdingdon: Routledge) pp. 1–6.
Kitzinger, J. Chimba, M., Williams, A., Haran, J. and Boyce, T. (2008)Gender, Stereotypes and Expertise in the Press: How Newspapers Represent Female and Male Scientists (Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology and Cardiff University).
Knight, D. (2006) Public Understanding of Science: A History of Communicating Scientific Ideas (Abingdon: Routledge).
Knight, D. (2009) The Making of Modern Science: Science, Technology, Medicine and Modernity 1789–1914 (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Knight, J.F., Carley, S., Tregunna, B., Jarvis, S., Smithies, R., De Freitas, S., Dunwell, I. and Mackway-Jones, K. (2010) ‘Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial’, Resuscitation, 81:9 1175–9.
Korthals, M. (2013) ‘Challenges to deliberations on genomics’, in O’Doherty, K. and Einsiedel, E. (eds) Public Engagement and Emerging Technologies (Vancouver: UBC Press).
Krishna, V.V. (2014) ‘Changing social relations between science and society: contemporary challenges’, Science, Technology & Society, 19:2 133–59.
Kushner, S. (2000) Personalizing Evaluation (London: Sage).
Lafrenière, D. and Cox, S.M. (2012) ‘Means of knowledge dissemination: are the Café Scientifique and the artistic performance equally effective?’, Sociology Mind, 2:2 191–9.
Laub Hansen, G. (2012) ‘Buffet serving – a nightmare of choices’ (Kolding: International Design Camp 2012). Retrieved 4 March 2015 at: http://designcamp2012.dskd.dk/about/articles/buffet-serving-a-nightmare-of-choices/.
Lauder, H., Brown, P. and Halsey, A.H. (2004) ‘Sociology and political arithmetic: some principles of a new policy science’, British Journal of Sociology, 55:1 3–22.
Leão, M.J. and Castro, S. (2012) ‘Science and rock: how music festivals can boost the progress of science’, EMBO Reports, 13:11 954–8.
Lee-Wright, P., Phillips, A. and Witschge, T. (2012) Changing Journalism (London: Routledge).
Lefebvre, R.C. (2013) Social Marketing and Social Change: Strategies and Tools for Health, Well-Being and the Environment (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
Lehr, J.L., McCallie, E., Davies, S.R., Caron, B.R., Gammon, B. and Duensing, S. (2007) ‘The value of “dialogue events” as sites of learning: an exploration of research and evaluation frameworks’, International Journal of Science Education, 29:12 1476–87.
Levy-Leboyer, C. (1986) ‘Applying psychology or applied psychology’, in Heller, F. (ed.) The Use and Abuse of Social Science (London: Sage Publications) pp. 24–35.
Lewis, J. (1990) Art, Culture and Enterprise: The Politics of Art and the Cultural Industries (London: Routledge).
Lightman, B. (2007) Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
Loader, I. and Sparks, R. (2011) Public Criminology? (Abingdon: Routledge).
Lövbrand, E. (2007) ‘Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science’, Environmental Science and Policy, 10:1 39–47.
Lukensmeyer, C.J. and Hasselblad Torres, L. (2006) Public Deliberation: A Managers Guide to Citizen Engagement (Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government).
Lynch, B. (2009) Whose Cake Is It Anyway? A Collaborative Investigation into Engagement and Participation in 12 Museums and Galleries in the UK (London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation).
Lynn, M.R. (2008) ‘Experimental physics in enlightenment Paris: the practice of popularization in urban culture’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 65–74.
Maile, S. (2014) ‘Social Science in the City™: reflections on public engagement’, in Maile, S. and Griffiths, D. (eds) Public Engagement and Social Science (Bristol: Policy Press) pp. 29–46.
Maile, S. and Griffiths, D. (2014a) ‘Cafe scientifique and the art of engaging publics’, in Maile, S. and Griffiths, D. (eds) Public Engagement and Social Science (Bristol: Policy Press) pp. 7–28.
Maile, S. and Griffiths, D. (eds) (2014b) Public Engagement and Social Science (Bristol: Policy Press).
Malin, B.J. (2011) ‘A very popular blog: the internet and the possibilities of publicity’, New Media & Society, 13:2 187–202.
Markman, K.M. (2012) ‘Doing radio, making friends, and having fun: Exploring the motivations of independent audio podcasters’, New Media & Society, 14:4 547–65.
Marsh, O. (2013) ‘A funny thing happened on the way to the laboratory: science and standup comedy’ (12 July). Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/07/12/a-funny-thinghappened-on-the-way-tothe-laboratory/#author.
Marwick, A.E. and boyd, d. (2011) ‘I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience’, New Media & Society, 13:1 114–33.
Mayhew, M.A. and Hall, M.K. (2012) ‘Science communication in a Café Scientifique for high school teens’, Science Communication, 34:4 546–54.
McCormick, T. (2014) ‘Social media for scientists – including the shy, overcommitted and unconvinced’, Elsevier Connect. Retrieved 3 March 2015 at: www.elsevier.com/connect/social-media-for-scientists-including-theshy-overcommitted-and-unconvinced.
McLaughlin, N. and Turcotte, K. (2007) ‘The trouble with Burawoy: an analytic, synthetic alternative’, Sociology, 41:5 813–28.
McMaster, B. (2008) Supporting Excellence in the Arts: From Measurement to Judgement (London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport). Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/supportingexcellenceinthearts.pdf.
McQuail, D. (1997) Audience Analysis (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
Mermikides, A., Van de Velde, A., Mermikides, M., Tanczos, A. and Weitkamp, E. (2015) ‘Devised performance as a tool for public engagement in acute haematological cancers’, in 30th General Meeting of the Belgian Haematological Society, Belgium, 30–31 January.
Merriman, N. (2012) ‘Transforming the university museum: the Manchester experience’, in Jandl, S.S. and Gold, M.S. (eds), A Handbook for Academic Museums: Beyond Exhibition and Education (Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc) pp. 36–61.
Metzger, M.J. and Flanagin, A.J. (2011) ‘Using Web 2.0 technologies to enhance evidence-based medical information’, Journal of Health Communication, 16 45–58.
Mewburn, I. and Thomson, P. (2013) ‘Why do academics blog? An analysis of audiences, purposes and challenges’, Studies in Higher Education, 38:8 1105–19.
Meyer, G. and Sandøe, P. (2012) ‘Going public: good scientific conduct’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18:2 173–97.
Meyer, M. (2010) ‘The rise of the knowledge broker’, Science Communication, 32:1 118–27.
Michael, M. (2009) ‘Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics’, Public Understanding of Science, 18:5 617–31.
Michael, M. and Brown, N. (2005) ‘Scientific citizenships: self-representations of xenotransplantation’s publics’, Science as Culture, 14:1 39–57.
Miller, A.I. (2014) Colliding Worlds: How Cutting-Edge Science Is Redefining Contemporary Art (New York: W.W. Norton and Company).
Monro, S. (2009) ‘The development of Our Dynamic Earth’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age: Theorising Professional Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press/Open University Press) pp. 195–208.
Moran, S. (2010) ‘Roles of creativity in society’, in Kaufman, J.C. and Sternberg, R.J. (eds) The Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 74–90.
Morrone, A. (2006) Guidelines for Measuring Cultural Participation (Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics).
Nascimento, S., Guimaraes Pereira, A. and Ghezzi, A. (2014) ‘From citizen science to do it yourself science: an annotated account of an ongoing movement’ (Ispra, Italy: European Commission).
National Endowment for the Arts (2013) How A Nation Engages with the Arts (Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts). Retrieved 10 July 2014 at: http://arts.gov/publications/highlights-from-2012-sppa.
NCCPE (2014a) ‘Communities of Practice’. Retrieved 3 December 2014 at www.publicengagement.ac.uk/.
NCCPE (2014b) ‘Engaging the public as researchers’. Retrieved 3 December at www.publicengagement.ac.uk/.
Noguera Vivo, J.M., Villi, M., Nyiro, N., De Blasio, E. and Bourdaa, M. (2014) ‘The role of the media industry when participation is a product’, in Carpentier, N., Christian Schrøder, K. and Hallett, L. (eds), Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity (New York: Routledge) pp. 172–87.
O’Mahony, P. (2013) The Contemporary Theory of the Public Sphere (Oxford: Peter Lang).
O’Neill, O. (2009) ‘Ethics for communication?’ European Journal of Philosophy, 17:2 167–80.
Owl Re (2008) Evaluating Communication Campaigns (Commugny: Owl Re).
Ox, J. and Lowenberg, R. (2012) ‘What is the challenge of art/science today and how do we address it?’, Leonardo, 46:1 2.
Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective (London: Sage).
Pearce, C., Diamond, S. and Bream, M. (2003) ‘BRIDGES 1: Interdisciplinary collaboration as practice’, Leonardo, 36:3 123–8.
Pearce, S.M. (1995) On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting in the European Tradition (Abingdon: Routledge).
Peer, L. and Ksiazek, T.B. (2011) ‘YouTube and the challenge to journalism: new standards for news videos online’, Journalism Studies, 12:1 45–63.
Peers, L. and Brown, A.K. (2003) ‘Introduction’, in Peers, L. and Brown, A.K. (eds) Museums and Source Communities: A Routledge Reader (London: Routledge) pp. 1–16.
Perez, L. (2008) ‘Technology, curiosity and utility in France and in England in the eighteenth century’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 25–42.
Pew Research Centre (2010) ‘Online activities’ (Washington: Pew Research Centre).
Pew Research Centre (2012) ‘Cell phone activities’ (Washington: Pew Research Centre).
Pew Research Centre (2013) ‘Online video report’ (Washington: Pew Research Centre).
Pimple, K.D. (2002) ‘Six domains of research ethics: a heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 8:2 191–205.
Pitrelli, N. (2010) ‘Road maps for the 21st century research in science communication’, Journal of Science Communication, 9:3 1–3.
Posner, R.A. (2003) Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Pouliot, C. (2011) ‘Post-secondary students’ relationship to people they consider to be scientific experts’, Research in Science Education, 41:2 225–43.
Powell, M. and Colin, M. (2009) ‘Participatory paradoxes: facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down?’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 29:4 325–42.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2015) A Study Guide to ‘Ethically Impossible’ STD Research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948 (Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues). Retrieved 20 March 2015 at: http://bioethics.gov/node/778.
Raddick, J.M., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A.S. and Vandenberg, J. (2010) ‘Galaxy Zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen scientists’, Astronomy Education Review, 9:1 010103.
Raddick, J.M., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A.S. and Vandenberg, J. (2013) ‘Galaxy Zoo: motivations of citizen science volunteers’, Astronomy Education Review, 12:1 010106.
RCUK (2009) ‘What is public engagement?’. Retrieved 28 March 2014 at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/scisoc/peupdate.pdf.
RCUK (2011) Evaluation Practical Guidelines: A Guide for Evaluating Public Engagement Activities (Swindon: RCUK).
Redfern, M. (2009) ‘Speaking to the world: radio and other audio’, in Holliman, R., Thomas, J., Smidt, S., Scanlon, E. and Whitelegg, E. (eds) Practising Science Communication in the Information Age: Theorising Professional Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 178–92.
Reichle, I. (2009) Art in the Age of Technoscience. Genetic Engineering, Robotics, and Artificial Life in Contemporary Art (New York: Springer-Wien).
Rennie, L.J. and Williams, G.F. (2006) ‘Adults learning about science in free-choice settings’, International Journal of Science Education, 28:8 871–93.
Richards, R. (2007) Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).
Riesch, H. (2015) ‘Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication’, Public Understanding of Science, 24:7 768-75.
Riesch, H., Potter, C. and Davies, L. (2013) ‘Combining citizen science and public engagement: the Open AirLaboratories Programme’, JCOM 12:3 A03.
Riesch, H. and Potter, C. (2014) ‘Citizen science as seen by scientists: methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions’, Public Understanding of Science, 23:1 107–20.
Riskin, J. (2008) ‘Amusing physics’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 43–64.
Rosen, J. (2011) ‘The people formerly known as the audience’, Huffington Post Media. Retrieved 23 January 2015 at: http://huffingtonpost.com/jay-rosen/the-people-formerly-known_1_b_24113.html.
Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E. and Lipsey, M.W. (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach 6th Edition (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2005) ‘A typology of public engagement mechanisms,’ Science, Technology and Human Values, 30:2 251–90.
Royal Society (2006) Science Communication: Survey of Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers (London: Royal Society).
Runco, M.A. (1996) ‘Personal creativity: definition and developmental issues’, New Directions for Child Development, 72 3–30.
Sardo, A.M. and Weitkamp, E. (2012) ‘Exploring the ways environmental science is used and valued by policy-makers in Portugal: a case study’, Journal of Science Communication, 11:3 c05.
Schäfer, M.S. (2009) ‘From public understanding to public engagement: an empirical assessment of changes in science coverage’, Science Communication, 30:4 475–505.
Schaffer, S. (2005) ‘Public experiments’, in Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds), Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: ZKM) pp. 298–307.
Science Foundation Ireland (2012) Agenda 2020 Excellence and Impact (Dublin: Science Foundation Ireland). Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: www.sfi.ie/assets/files/downloads/Newspercent20andpercent20Events/AGENDApercent202020.pdf.
Science Showoff (2014) ‘What is Science Showoff?’ Retrieved 3 December 2014 at: www.scienceshowoff.org/.
Scott, C. (2003) ‘Museums and impact’, Curator, 46:3 293–310.
Seeman, N.C. (2014) ‘Art as a stimulus for structural DNA nanotechnology’, Leonardo, 47:2 142–9.
Sharpe, L.J. (1975) ‘The social scientist and policy-making: some cautionary thoughts and transatlantic reflections’, Policy and Politics, 4:2 7–34.
Sheedy, A. (2008) Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation (Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks).
Shiner, L. (2001) The Invention of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd).
Silvertown, J. (2009) ‘A new dawn for citizen science’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24:9 467–71.
Singer, P. (1994) ‘Introduction’, in Singer, P. (ed.) Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 3–13.
Smith Iltis, A. (2006) ‘Human subjects research: ethics and compliance’, in Smith Iltis, A. (ed.) Research Ethics (New York: Routledge) pp. 1–21.
Snow, C.P. (1993) The Two Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sonnenburg, S. (2004) ‘Creativity in communication: a theoretical framework for collaborative product creation’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 13:4 254–62.
Sprague, J. (2008) ‘Sociology, the good, the bad and the public’, Gender and Society, 22:6 697–704.
Stafford, B.M. (1994) Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Steele, D.R. (2012) The Open-Source Everything Manifesto: Transparency, Truth and Trust (Berkeley, CA: Evolver Editions).
Steel, B., List, P., Lach, D. and Shindler, B. (2004) ‘The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: a case study from the American west’, Environmental Science and Policy, 7:1 1–13.
Stewart, L. (2008) ‘The laboratory, the workshop and the theatre of experiment’, in Bensaude-Vincent, B. and Blondel, C. (eds) Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment (Aldershot: Ashgate) pp. 11–24.
Stryker, J.B. and Santoro, M.D. (2012) ‘Facilitating face-to-face communication in high tech teams’, Research Technology Management, 55:1 51–6.
Suda, E., Macer, D. and Matsuda, I. (2009) ‘Challenges to public engagement in science and technology in Japan: experiences in the HapMap project’, Genomics, Society and Policy, 5:1 114–33.
Sumner, D.E. and Miller, H.G. (2013) Feature and Magazine Writing, third edition (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).
Sumners, C., Reiff, P. and Weber, W. (2008) ‘Learning in an immersive digital theatre’, Advances in Space Research, 42:11 1848–54.
Sutcliffe, H. (2011) A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation (Brussels: Matter).
Sutcliffe, S. and Court, J. (2005) Evidence-Based Policymaking: What Is It? How Does It Work? What Relevance for Developing Countries? (London: Overseas Development Institute).
Sutcliffe, S. and Court, J. (2006) A Toolkit for Progressive Policymakers in Developing Countries (London: Overseas Development Institute). Retrieved 18 March 2015 at: www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odiassets/publications-opinion-files/190.pdf.
Sutton, G.V. (1995) Science for a Polite Society: Gender, Culture and the Demonstration of Enlightenment (Oxford: Westview Press).
Teacher, A.G.F., Griffiths, D.J., Hodgson, D.J. and Inger, R. (2013) ‘Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive’, Ecology and Evolution, 3:16 5268–78.
Terras, M. (2012) ‘The verdict: is blogging or tweeting about research papers worth it?’ Retrieved 1 December 2015 at: http://www.blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/04/19/blog-tweeting-papers-worth-it/.
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
The Royal Society (1985) The Public Understanding of Science (London: The Royal Society).
Thody, A. (2006) Writing and Presenting Research (London: Sage).
Thompson, P.B. (2012) ‘Ethics and risk communication’, Science Communication, 34:5 618–41.
Thorpe, C. and Gregory, J. (2010) ‘Producing the post-Fordist public: the political economy of public engagement with science’, Science as Culture, 19:3 273–301.
Thorpe, V. and Rogers, R. (2011) ‘Women bloggers call for a stop to “hateful” trolling by misogynist men’, The Guardian Blogs. Retrieved 25 March 2015 at: www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/05/women-bloggers-hateful-trolling.
TNS Opinion and Social (2013) Special Eurobarometer 399: Cultural Access and Participation. Retrieved 10 July 2014 at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_399_en.pdf.
Torjesen, I. (2014) ‘NHS England postpones roll-out of Care.data programme by six months’, British Medical Journal, 348 g.1689.
Trench, B. (2008). ‘Towards an analytical framework of science communication models’, in Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B. and Shi, S. (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices (New York: Springer) pp. 119–35.
Tryon, E. and Ross, J.A. (2012) ‘A Community–University Exchange Project Modeled after Europe’s Science Shops’, Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 16:2 197–211.
TSO (2009) Managing Successful Projects with Prince2® (London: The Stationery Office).
Turner, S. (2007) ‘Public sociology and democratic theory’, Sociology, 41:5 785–98.
United Nations (2011) Guidelines on Citizens’ Engagement for Development Management and Public Governance (New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs).
United Nations (2013) Citizen Engagement and the Post-2015 Development Agenda Report of the Expert Group Meeting (New York: United Nations).
van Dijck, J. (2013a) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
van Dijck, J. (2013b) ‘“You have one identity”: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn’, Media, Culture & Society, 35:2 199–215.
van Noorden, R. (2014) ‘Scientists and the social network’, Nature, 512, 126–9.
Velarde, G. (2001) Designing Exhibitions: Museums, Heritage Trade and World Fairs, second edition (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Vitos, M., Stevens, M., Lewis, J. and Hakley, M. (2013) ‘Making local knowledge matter: supporting non-literate people to monitor poaching in Congo’, Third Annual Symposium on Computing for Development (ACM DEV 2013), doi: 0.1145/2442882.2442884.
Ward, B. (2008) ‘Explaining controversial issues to the media and public’, SciDevNet. Retrieved 2 March 2015 at: www.scidev.net/global/communication/practical-guide/explaining-controversial-issues-to-the-media-and-t.html.
Watchelder, J. (2003) ‘Democratising science: various routes and visions of Dutch science shops’, Public Understanding of Science, 28:2 244–73.
Weitkamp, E. (2012) ‘Researchers need help to speak the language of policy’, Research Europe. Retrieved 18 March 2015 at: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/17089/2/Research_php.mht.
Weitkamp, E. and Mermikides, A. (in preparation) ‘Audience engagement with Bloodlines’.
Wheeler, S. (2012) ‘Digital literacies for engagement in emerging online cultures’, eLC Research Paper Series, 5 14–25.
White, G. (2012) ‘On immersive theatre’, Theatre Research International, 37:3 221–35.
Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. (2015) ‘Surveying the citizen science landscape’, First Monday, 20:1. Retrieved 23 July 2015 at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5520.
Wiles, R. (2013) What Are Qualitative Research Ethics? (London: Bloomsbury Academic).
Wilkinson, C. (2010) ‘Science and the citizen’, in Brake, M. and Weitkamp, E. (eds) Introducing Science Communication (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) pp. 52–76.
Wilkinson, C. (2012) The ESRC Festival of Social Science: Learning and Success (Swindon: ESRC).
Wilkinson, C. (2013) Community Engagement and Mobilisation: Critique of a Public Dialogue Day (Swindon: ESRC).
Wilkinson, C. and Weitkamp, E. (2013) ‘A case study in serendipity? Environmental researchers’ use of traditional and social media for dissemination’. PLoS ONE, 8:12 e84339.
Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K. and Dawson, E. (2011b) ‘“Oh yes, robots! People like robots; the robot people should do something”: perspectives and prospects in public engagement with robotics’, Science Communication, 33:3 367–97.
Wilkinson, C., Dawson, E. and Bultitude, K. (2011a) ‘“Younger people have like more of an imagination, no offence”: participant perspectives on public engagement’, International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2 (1) 43–61.
Wilkinson, H. (2014) ‘Sharing worlds: managing complex community relationships in challenging times’, in Maile, S. and Griffiths, D. (eds) Public Engagement and Social Science (Bristol: Policy Press) pp. 201–14.
Wilsdon, J. and Willis, J. (2004) See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (London: Demos).
Wilson, S. (2010) Art + Science Now: How Scientific Research and Technological Innovation Are Becoming Key to 21st-Century Aesthetics (London: Thames and Hudson).
Wolinsky, H. (2010) ‘Of guerrillas and cafés: scientists are experimenting with new initiatives to talk to the people’, EMBO Reports, 11:4 263–6.
Woolf, F. (2004) Partnerships for Learning: A Guide to Evaluating Art Education Projects (London: Arts Council for England).
World Bank (2015) ‘Internet users (per 100 people)’. Retrieved 13 March 2015 at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2.
Zhou, Z., Jin, X.-L., Vogel, D.R., Fang, Y. and Chen, X. (2011) ‘Individual motivations and demographic differences in social virtual world uses: an exploratory investigation in Second Life’, International Journal of Information Management, 31:3 261–71.
Zwijnenberg, R. (2009) ‘Art, the life sciences and the humanities: in search of a relationship’, preface to Reichle, I., Art in the Age of Technoscience. Genetic Engineering, Robotics and Artificial Life in Contemporary Art (New York: Springer-Wien), pp. xiii–xxix.